DX50 a new smaller DAP from iBasso. Spec. page 1. Impressions start on page. . .
Jul 4, 2013 at 2:09 AM Post #1,053 of 3,609
That's good of them. Probably a given though. They held their JH3A customers waiting for over a year of delays and zero personalized apologies or updates, pre-order was for the full MSRP, not just a deposit. Not entirely their fault but they could've handled it much better than they did. 
Quote:
Yah, JHA gave customers freqphase before they knew that they were getting an upgrade. Stuff happens and Ibasso isn't reinventing the wheel. Should be here this summer and that's great.

 
Jul 4, 2013 at 5:33 AM Post #1,054 of 3,609
Hopefully the trail will not just go cold for a while (see the desktop ES9018 DAC)...

P.S.: any news on that one?
 
Jul 4, 2013 at 8:28 AM Post #1,055 of 3,609
Quote:
Why announce a product and release it after eternity?
 
Loosing interest on it now **sigh**

 
LOL!  AM I the only one here who thought your remark was quite possibly meant ironically rather than seriously?
 
Just look how absurdly long and drawn out the HM-901 release has been - substantially longer than a year!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
@ everyone;  I really think we should not be too quick to criticise iBasso. This is early days, still. Let's have a little patience! 
size]

 
 
I can't help thinking that, in addition to any possible production complications, my remarks in this thread, a few days ago, may be relevant in terms of iBasso's reluctance-vs-enthusiasm to release the DX50:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/661167/dx50-a-new-smaller-dap-coming-from-ibasso-specifications-page-1/930#post_9554704
 
Jul 4, 2013 at 12:17 PM Post #1,056 of 3,609
Quote:
That's good of them. Probably a given though. They held their JH3A customers waiting for over a year of delays and zero personalized apologies or updates, pre-order was for the full MSRP, not just a deposit. Not entirely their fault but they could've handled it much better than they did. 

rolleyes.gif

 
Jul 6, 2013 at 6:06 PM Post #1,061 of 3,609
Quote:
Pleasure of vapoware, seriously though one problem with announcing early and delivering late is that the patience wears thin and one might seriously look somewhere else for an available alternative.

This thread has also been quite the highlight of  banging on pots and pans rattling off about wanting their golden goose now.
 
I personally would like to see a release done right, rather than have a product rushed out the door and have numerable problems down the line.
 
Jul 6, 2013 at 6:15 PM Post #1,062 of 3,609
Overall, iBasso did a worthy job with the DX100. That gives them credibility, in my eyes, and earns them my patience in relation to the development & release of the DX50.
 
It seems quite a few people in this thread have extremely short memories, blinkered vision, or perhaps both.
 
Even not taking the venerable DX100 into account, it's still only the beginning of July, so iBasso are hardly taking liberties with the DX50 release date. I'm anticipating it towards end of 2013, and I'm not going to moan during the interim. They know what they're doing; the DX100 showed us that, so if there's a delay in releasing the DX50 I trust iBasso that it is for a legitimate reason.
 
The irony of this delay, for the moaners out there, is that even if iBasso released the DX50 tomorrow, they'd still moan about the firmware being not sufficiently polished, or the X5 being on the horizon.
 
If the DX50 doesn't materialize before 2014, then maybe I'll become unsettled, but for the remainder of 2013, I'm willing to sit patiently and wait.
 
Jul 6, 2013 at 7:09 PM Post #1,064 of 3,609
Dont get me wrong... but I'm impatient. Must be the stress of having 2 toddlers under 3 years.
Quote:
That's how it goes, and there's nothing wrong with it. Be glad iBasso isn't JH Audio.

 
Quote:
 
LOL!  AM I the only one here who thought your remark was quite possibly meant ironically rather than seriously?
 
Just look how absurdly long and drawn out the HM-901 release has been - substantially longer than a year!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
@ everyone;  I really think we should not be too quick to criticise iBasso. This is early days, still. Let's have a little patience! 
size]

 
 
I can't help thinking that, in addition to any possible production complications, my remarks in this thread, a few days ago, may be relevant in terms of iBasso's reluctance-vs-enthusiasm to release the DX50:
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/661167/dx50-a-new-smaller-dap-coming-from-ibasso-specifications-page-1/930#post_9554704

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top