headwhacker
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Posts
- 4,763
- Likes
- 770
@artpiggo @headwhacker
guys I was sure it was not easy the comparison...but pls try to follow the sense of my words...let's take a real world example, using a couple camera with the same sensor (BSI) tecnology: sony a9 24mpx and sony a7r2 (42mpx)...let's take a shot at 12.800 iso, so a noisy image and let's resize a7r2 image to 24mpx. The sense of a bigger megapixel camera is not only to do larger print...if you compare the a7r2 image resized to 24mpx A9 image, you will see less noise and more details in a7r2 vs a9, all things being equal (same resolution).
The analogy is that in audio world we have big problems with noise. From when we start in the recording room till the final listen in our home system. (for example the DAC when it does its conversions...). Every part of the audio chain has to do good(optimum) job to minimize noise, etc and the better is done this job, the better will be preserved our sound in the range where we are more sensitive...for this reason the more larger informations we keep, the better (theoretically) final result will should get in the final listening in the good "limited" range where we can hear...long story, I don't want to go OT...just to give an idea of the sense of my analogy...
Always a mistake to use photography as analogy for audio. Will just make you and everyone else confused. So please stop, it will not go anywhere productive.