mrmoto050
1000+ Head-Fier
I don't know. Maybe because the company is in China.Why is everything primarily available in the East Asian market?
I don't know. Maybe because the company is in China.Why is everything primarily available in the East Asian market?
These special versions that only two people get to buy for 10.000 bucks are a lousy business practice. Don't call them dx200, it just pisses off dx200 clients. Give them other names, cool mythologicial names or whatever. Put some imaginaton into it. They don't have the same components inside as the dx200 anyway, you can't get a night and day improvement without adding tuning and component upgades.
Since I didn't want this to become that conversation. Here's what I came to say.
Amp 4 is much better than amp 4s. If you can't tell the detail and soundstage difference, or think it's negligible, then you don't have sensitive enough equipment. With the u18 tzar the amp4 is absolutely night and day more detailed. The soundstage is huuuuge. Truly mindboggling stuff that makes you feel like your head is twice the size it usually is. (Impossible to explain if you haven't heard it). Amp 4s is a nice mainstream bassy sound with a round soundstage and good, but not great detail. An improved amp3. Also, amp4s does not have deeper soundstage than amp4. Amp4 is more holographic in every way. Better width and depth. I've done side by side comparisons with the u18 these past days and it has made me respect the amp4 even more than I used to. The dx200 with amp4 is an absolute end game greatest ever contender for portable audio. It doesn't need unobtanium-plated special editions, it needs another batch of amp 4, the original version.
These special versions that only two people get to buy for 10.000 bucks are a lousy business practice. Don't call them dx200, it just pisses off dx200 clients. Give them other names, cool mythologicial names or whatever. Put some imaginaton into it. They don't have the same components inside as the dx200 anyway, you can't get a night and day improvement without adding tuning and component upgades.
Since I didn't want this to become that conversation. Here's what I came to say.
Amp 4 is much better than amp 4s. If you can't tell the detail and soundstage difference, or think it's negligible, then you don't have sensitive enough equipment. With the u18 tzar the amp4 is absolutely night and day more detailed. The soundstage is huuuuge. Truly mindboggling stuff that makes you feel like your head is twice the size it usually is. (Impossible to explain if you haven't heard it). Amp 4s is a nice mainstream bassy sound with a round soundstage and good, but not great detail. An improved amp3. Also, amp4s does not have deeper soundstage than amp4. Amp4 is more holographic in every way. Better width and depth. I've done side by side comparisons with the u18 these past days and it has made me respect the amp4 even more than I used to. The dx200 with amp4 is an absolute end game greatest ever contender for portable audio. It doesn't need unobtanium-plated special editions, it needs another batch of amp 4, the original version.
What? $10,000 for a DX200 Ti.?That is insane.
What? $10,000 for a DX200 Ti.?That is insane.
The IT04's sound AMAZING with the DX200...in any configuration. Period.
The IT04's sound AMAZING with the DX200...in any configuration. Period.
Looks like Lurker has done some battery optimization in their FW. I will go home tonight and flash this Lurker FW and check it out.
I am patiently waiting to see for myself. In the meantime, I've decided to try DX200>AMP4S>CB12S>W40... I expect it'll be a tad warm compared to the IT03.
I found out I could only flash the FW in a 32bit mode of Win10 but not be able to do so in 64bit of Win10. but anyway, its done and I will check on the battery life and other performance. Just one question, there is another player inside and whats the difference between the default player from DX200 and this new one? will it sound different? thanks
I don't know. Maybe because the company is in China.