DUNU DN-2000J -- More Than Evolution?

May 23, 2015 at 2:02 AM Post #347 of 2,123
Is it lacking depth, and the price is perfect :ok_hand:.

 
I won't say it is lacking depth, though it doesn't have 'great' depth either, so to speak.
 
May 23, 2015 at 6:01 PM Post #349 of 2,123
One person's opinion Mo'.  I really like the mid-range. And I do think the overall changes are definitely an improvement to the old DN-2000. If you can wait a few more days, reviews should start appearing - and then you can see a range of opinions - including comparisons to other earphones.
 
May 24, 2015 at 11:06 AM Post #351 of 2,123
I'll do that, but it is on the verge of being of the list :sweat_smile:.

 
 
Don't worry mochill, we'll get to the bottom of this soon. Together. 
wink.gif
 
 
Like any new product it takes time to form the big picture, we're all but different paint colours towards it.
 
May 24, 2015 at 10:45 PM Post #353 of 2,123
I just received mine on Friday, and have been using it throughout the weekend.
 
One thing for sure, a definite upgrade from the 2k, so those people who like the 2k, I can safely say that you guys will love the 2kJ.
 
Overall signature is similar to the 2k, however from what I remember of the 2k, the 2kJ has a better clarity in the midrange.
 
More impression soon - Dunu recommends 100-200 hour burn in, but I know @mochill will do at least 1,500 hours 
bigsmile_face.gif

 
Not a big believer in burn in, but out of the box, the treble was a bit harsh and grainy, and significantly improved after about 10 hours or so of usage
 
May 25, 2015 at 2:49 AM Post #356 of 2,123
@ClieOS Have you tried them with the A10 Walkman at all?
 
May 25, 2015 at 3:46 AM Post #357 of 2,123
   
Neutral to slightly dry. Position wise, it is more or less similar to the original 2K, but because it has a more neutral bass, the overall image is flatter (or should I say 'in the same plane') as oppose to 2K where it falls just a bit behind bass.

 
Hmmmm I actually prefer 2K bass level, just nice for me. But let's see. Still waiting for my 2KJ.
What eartips you used for 2KJ ?
 
May 25, 2015 at 3:51 AM Post #358 of 2,123
  I just received mine on Friday, and have been using it throughout the weekend.
 
One thing for sure, a definite upgrade from the 2k, so those people who like the 2k, I can safely say that you guys will love the 2kJ.
 
Overall signature is similar to the 2k, however from what I remember of the 2k, the 2kJ has a better clarity in the midrange.
 
More impression soon - Dunu recommends 100-200 hour burn in, but I know @mochill will do at least 1,500 hours 
bigsmile_face.gif

 
Not a big believer in burn in, but out of the box, the treble was a bit harsh and grainy, and significantly improved after about 10 hours or so of usage

 
Thanks!
Please let us know the eartips you use with 2KJ, and how they change the sound signature.
 
May 25, 2015 at 8:41 AM Post #359 of 2,123
  @ClieOS Have you tried them with the A10 Walkman at all?

 
Yes, I did. Probably because of A10's slightly higher output impedance, the 2KJ sounds just a tiny bit less bright., which isn't a totally bad thing, as It makes 2Kj just a bit smoother. The overall result is pretty good, but by no mean the best 2KJ can be.
 
   
Hmmmm I actually prefer 2K bass level, just nice for me. But let's see. Still waiting for my 2KJ.
What eartips you used for 2KJ ?

 
The stock single flange.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top