@Colinharding: there you go
Quote:
great write up.
I do enjoy my 5x. I had to send it in twice for a refit and the last time i was thinking to myself.... was the sound even that good? maybe ill just cut my losses, sell the 5x for half and stick with my W4. Then i got them back... fit is still not perfect, not even close to my past two customs (one was made at the same lab as the 5x) but its good enough and im sure these refits arent free so Mitch is losing money. i would like to note, that during the last refit, there was a large scratch along side the face plate. Mitch knows and looked in to it. It hurts the look of them, but again, not a huge deal. Maybe ill just pay myself later down the line to get it reshelled if it bothers me.
in the end, the separation compared to the w4 is awesome. Sound quality is better than the w4 and the value is great. i really like the w4 but i havent touched it since the 5x came back.... not sure when ill grab them again.
btw, using it with the j3 unamped and silver dragon IEM cable.
I'm sorry to hear about that caracara08. I consider myself lucky not to been faced with such things - having such a great sounding phone fit so poorly must be torture! Also, the acquired scratch sounds like a real bothersome eyesore. What did Mitch have to say?
It's interesting that you mention your setup, as I'm also using a J3 + Moon Audio SD cable. What effects are you using, if any? I ask because for the first time I've turned off all BBE enhancements, finding the AUD-5X to excessively exaggerate their properties, which suddenly sound overly synthetic and unbalanced (perhaps linked to the AUD-5Xs sensitivity to poor mixing/mastering?). Subsequently I'm now questioning my source - which without effects could be described as a glorified Clip+ - and am considering downgrading to appease my bruised and beaten wallet.
Quote:
Fantastic review, Nulliverse.. it gives me a very good idea of what to expect if I order the 5X.
Thanks Flysweep - I'm glad it's been useful to you.
Quote:
Nulliverse, could you post your impressions regarding note thickness and timbre for these? I'm worried, going from a dynamic driver earphone to a multi-BA setup, that I'll lose some of the natural sound. Specifically, I'm comparing to the JVC FXT90s - no doubt the 5Xs are significantly better in every technical matter, but are they as musical? Also, regarding the treble, are the customs less fatiguing than the JVCs?
Thanks!
It's interesting that you mention the FXT90s Nyonya, as they were perhaps my favorite universal, at least in terms of signature. Alas they were sold to fund the AUD-5X, without any regrets I might add. The JVCs offer great clarity due to the boost in the upper mids, compared to the Dreamnearz which offer outstanding clarity through transparency and resolution. The JVCs are much brighter and leaner sounding... but that's not to say that the Dreamearz are warm or bottom heavy, despite having greater thickness of note. I'd say the thickness of note is very natural, making thicker sounding phones such as the SM3 sound dark, muddy and ill-defined.
Timbre is a difficult one to comment on without the FXT90s to hand, but looking at notes and going by my current state of awe, I'd say that the AUD-5X sound much more natural, not only through timbre, but through dynamics and conveyance of ambiance (as well as numerous other things). Like you, I came from a largely dynamic background, so had similar reservations about musicality, and even more so cohesion (jumping from 1 driver to 5!?). Initially, the AUD-5X was a little overwhelming, purely due to the drastic increase in separation, resolution and numerous other things. The amount of musical info entering my brain forced me to look at detail after detail... but after my brain adjusted accordingly (4 hours or so), I found the AUD-5Xs to be just as musical as the FXT90s, if not more so, as the musicality is achieved without the sig being nearly as colored as the JVCs.
In terms of treble the Dreamearz are many, many times more detailed and articulate, yet also much smoother, and significantly less fatiguing (not that I ever had an issue with the FXT90s).
Quote:Originally Posted by
average_joe /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Great review; it is great to see a review from a different perspective than mine, thank you for posting it! One thing I try to get across, and what was surprising for me going to custom IEMs is that they can have so much more capability and do things much better than I imagined was possible. Of course, that isn't true for all CIEMs, but it is for the aud-5X as you have so eloquently pointed out.
Thankyou. And I concur that above all else, the thing that has surprised me most about the AUD-5X is just how much better it is than anything I've previously heard. It's as if it's combined the strengths of all my favorite universals, improved upon them, and done away with the trade-offs. Quite a feat given the price!