[upstateguy]

This post was taken out of context from another thread. The beginning is missing and so is the end.

 

[PhilS]

Isn't this a link to a DBT?

 

[upstateguy]

.

 

[PhilS]

Quote:

Originally Posted by upstateguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif For informational purposes only, not for discussion. USG

Well, for informational purposes only, and not for purposes of discussion, it's against the rules of the forum.

 

[milkweg]

It's only a problem if you make it a problem.

 

[PhilS]

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkweg /img/forum/go_quote.gif It's only a problem if you make it a problem.

What!? Haven't others already made it clear that they have a problem with it? It's against the rules of the forum, for a good reason. If you want to discuss DBT's, why don't go do it in the Sound Science forum.

 

[FallenAngel]

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhilS /img/forum/go_quote.gif What!? Haven't others already made it clear that they have a problem with it? It's against the rules of the forum, for a good reason. If you want to discuss DBT's, why don't go do it in the Sound Science forum.

Yep, double that. As much as I hate to get into it, I must admit that my perception of DBT testing makes it a completely useless test, switching things constantly back and forth makes it hard for me to test things. Now when I listen to something for a few hours, like an entire CD, go for lunch, come back and do it again on a different system, then I can usually see differences.

 

[triode12]

Quote:

Originally Posted by FallenAngel /img/forum/go_quote.gif Yep, double that. As much as I hate to get into it, I must admit that my perception of DBT testing makes it a completely useless test, switching things constantly back and forth makes it hard for me to test things. Now when I listen to something for a few hours, like an entire CD, go for lunch, come back and do it again on a different system, then I can usually see differences.

especially if you had a couple or more beers during lunch...

 

[Uncle Erik]

Quote:

Originally Posted by upstateguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif The "challenge" may not let you pit an 8W 300B SET amp against a 100W MOSFET amp, but I think, as in the original Stereo Review test, Link to Original Test it will let you pit a $200. Pioneer against 12k Futterman monoblocks.

Then why is that?

Will you agree that a 300B amp and a MOSFET amp sound different? Your argument seems to prove the point, does it not?

 

[upstateguy]

.

 

[FallenAngel]

Quote:

Originally Posted by upstateguy /img/forum/go_quote.gif Will you agree that you would not be able to tell the difference between the $200 Pioneer and the 12K monoblocks? USG

Having not heard them, I won't agree that I can tell a difference, but I think I could. Seriously, this is against the forum rules, lets not get into DBT discussions.

 

[Taikero]

Quote:

Originally Posted by FallenAngel /img/forum/go_quote.gif Having not heard them, I won't agree that I can tell a difference, but I think I could. Seriously, this is against the forum rules, lets not get into DBT discussions.

I thought discussing only double-blind testing of cables was against the forum rules.

 

[PFKMan23]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taikero I thought discussing only double-blind testing of cables was against the forum rules.

http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f21/do-not-discuss-dbt-any-other-forums-except-sound-science-forum-227350/
Quote:

We do not engage in the discussion of double-blind testing (DBT) of cables or any other components anywhere on this site except for the Sound Science forum.

 

[upstateguy]

.

 

[upstateguy]

.