Denon AH-D7000
Jun 14, 2011 at 12:42 AM Post #4,096 of 7,464
Good question! I've been wondering about a bag for mine, too. I was going to take mine home last weekend to try with my new vintage amps, but I was carrying a lot of stuff and the D7000 box is so cumbersome.
 
HeadRoom has some headphone bags here:
 
http://www.headphone.com/accessories/headcase-bag-w-shoulder-strap.php
 
Does anyone here use these? Do they keep the D7000s safe from scratching?
 


 


I have a couple of the HeaRoom bags. They are pretty nice, really handy for meets etc... The inside is pretty soft, but I'd worry a little about the wood cups if you were using it a lot. I would worry the clear coat might get damaged over time. The other downside is that there is no structure to them, so if you stuff it in a back pack nothing will really protect them from getting crushed.

Another option to consider is getting a Pelican case. Not quite as portable, but you'll know they are well protected. You can see an example of this if you look at the travel case Audeze is selling now with the LCD-2. Check out Pelican.com and you can see the different sizes and how to pluck the foam for a custom fit.

 
Jun 14, 2011 at 1:07 AM Post #4,097 of 7,464
the pelican is a really good idea, i have a 1520 that i use for my camera gear and it keeps my 5D mark II + 4 lenses and accessories safe from everything but nukes... i tried a friends 1200 today (the smallest they make) and i'd have to squish the D7k's much more than i want in order to close it. im thinking about going a step up but honestly, once i do that, i'm looking at a case that's the same size (and a bit heavier!) than the original box they came in... what i really want is a hardcase like the Pro 900's come in. i could obviously deal with it being a bit thicker to accommodate the d7ks, given that the pro 900's can lie flat, but i'm not sure if anything's out there that will fit the bill. 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 9:42 AM Post #4,098 of 7,464
The biggest reason they're hard to transport is the lack of downfold. They're absolutely huge, and do nothing to make them portable. 
 
Quote:
the pelican is a really good idea, i have a 1520 that i use for my camera gear and it keeps my 5D mark II + 4 lenses and accessories safe from everything but nukes... i tried a friends 1200 today (the smallest they make) and i'd have to squish the D7k's much more than i want in order to close it. im thinking about going a step up but honestly, once i do that, i'm looking at a case that's the same size (and a bit heavier!) than the original box they came in... what i really want is a hardcase like the Pro 900's come in. i could obviously deal with it being a bit thicker to accommodate the d7ks, given that the pro 900's can lie flat, but i'm not sure if anything's out there that will fit the bill. 



 
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 12:11 PM Post #4,100 of 7,464
How do these truly compare to the Pro 900s?  I've read the reviews and comparisons on the forum but just wondering if any one else has any input from actual experience with the two.  I have about 50-60 hours on my Pro 900s with the Blue Dragon cable, silver velour pads, and running it through a Titanium HD sound card + E9 amp.
 
I am thinking of upgrading to a Little Dot MKIII in the future or even a Valhalla but that's a little further off.
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 12:58 PM Post #4,101 of 7,464
ive had he pro 900s + BD cable for about 2 months, about 500 hours burn in. ive had the d7000s for under a week, and well... my signature says it all. the thing that kept killing me about the pro 900s was how incredibly colored the sound was. i'm an EDM listener and that's probably 70% of what i use my headphones for, 20% for gaming and 10% for tv. with the pro 900s, i found myself really enjoying them for most of my EDM, but when it came to any other genre, gaming, or TV, i'd put the 990/600s on for their more natural, yet still fun (bass and treble emphasized) sound. the pro 900s were about as far away from an all-arounder that i could think of. their soundstage/imaging is ok for a closed can, but when it came to competitive gaming through the astro mixamp with dolby headphone, i can't relaly describe it other than to say that within 3 seconds i'd ripped them off my head. nothing was coming from the right direction and everything was scrambled. the 990/600s have a pinpoint accurate soundstage. and with the BD cable, the basshead in me was in heaven, but the rest of me knew that, if i could only have one pair of cans... i wanted a hybrid of the pro 900s and the 990s. the d7000s are exactly this. i have no idea how denon's done it. they've managed to keep the same natural, un-colored yet still fun sound from the 990s, as well as having a soundstage that really, truly is mind boggling for a closed can, and combining it with bass response that has 100% of the extension and less boomyness than the pro 900s. like i said before, i'm a basshead, but the pro 900s + BD could be overkill. when i wanted the bass, it was so there and so wonderful. but when i wanted to hear mids or treble, i could hear bass. lots of basssss. hence the constant switching of the cans. now... the d7ks just never leave my ears.
 
perhaps the best way i can think of characterizing the two is to say that the pro 900s never let you forget you were wearing them, while the d7ks let you sink gloriously into a soft pillow of amazingly accurate, analytical, fun, non-fatiguing sound. the pro 900s are so bright and yet so bassy, so you're hearing some sibilance that makes you wince, bass that blurs your vision and legitimately has me checking to see if my subwoofer is on, and a clamping force that, while not uncomfortably tight, definitely reminds you you're wearing big mean scary headphones, and i could never exactly relax with them on. the brushed metal backs of the cans reflect the metallic quality of the sound (this is the "coloration" that i speak of; some might define it differently) which absolutely makes most EDM sound fantastic, but also has me asking "is this REALLY how that sounds??" far too often. the d7ks... from the moment you put them on, while they aren't an 880 or 990 (honestly, what could match that comfort?) you forget they are there and you wind up with a huge smile on your face because you know, inherently, this is how music should sound. songs that i've listened to 300 or more times before finally sound correct. i know that's about as objective as it gets, but there's a gut feeling that what i'm listening to is truly the purest, most wonderful sound... i could go on and on, but the bottom line is, if you can afford em, even if you think you're a basshead and the pro 990s + BD cable are it for you, the D7ks will probably surprise you in a very positive way. i could definitely keep going, and if there's any particular bits that i didn't mention please ask and i'll do my best to respond.
 
bottom line: the D7k's sound signature is very very similar to the 990/600s. imagine 990s with more bass presence, extension, detail, and slam, and a bit less treble, and you're there. the D7ks make the pro 900's sound metallic, boomy, and scooped.
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 2:59 PM Post #4,102 of 7,464


Quote:
ive had he pro 900s + BD cable for about 2 months, about 500 hours burn in. ive had the d7000s for under a week, and well... my signature says it all. the thing that kept killing me about the pro 900s was how incredibly colored the sound was. i'm an EDM listener and that's probably 70% of what i use my headphones for, 20% for gaming and 10% for tv. with the pro 900s, i found myself really enjoying them for most of my EDM, but when it came to any other genre, gaming, or TV, i'd put the 990/600s on for their more natural, yet still fun (bass and treble emphasized) sound. the pro 900s were about as far away from an all-arounder that i could think of. their soundstage/imaging is ok for a closed can, but when it came to competitive gaming through the astro mixamp with dolby headphone, i can't relaly describe it other than to say that within 3 seconds i'd ripped them off my head. nothing was coming from the right direction and everything was scrambled. the 990/600s have a pinpoint accurate soundstage. and with the BD cable, the basshead in me was in heaven, but the rest of me knew that, if i could only have one pair of cans... i wanted a hybrid of the pro 900s and the 990s. the d7000s are exactly this. i have no idea how denon's done it. they've managed to keep the same natural, un-colored yet still fun sound from the 990s, as well as having a soundstage that really, truly is mind boggling for a closed can, and combining it with bass response that has 100% of the extension and less boomyness than the pro 900s. like i said before, i'm a basshead, but the pro 900s + BD could be overkill. when i wanted the bass, it was so there and so wonderful. but when i wanted to hear mids or treble, i could hear bass. lots of basssss. hence the constant switching of the cans. now... the d7ks just never leave my ears.
 
perhaps the best way i can think of characterizing the two is to say that the pro 900s never let you forget you were wearing them, while the d7ks let you sink gloriously into a soft pillow of amazingly accurate, analytical, fun, non-fatiguing sound. the pro 900s are so bright and yet so bassy, so you're hearing some sibilance that makes you wince, bass that blurs your vision and legitimately has me checking to see if my subwoofer is on, and a clamping force that, while not uncomfortably tight, definitely reminds you you're wearing big mean scary headphones, and i could never exactly relax with them on. the brushed metal backs of the cans reflect the metallic quality of the sound (this is the "coloration" that i speak of; some might define it differently) which absolutely makes most EDM sound fantastic, but also has me asking "is this REALLY how that sounds??" far too often. the d7ks... from the moment you put them on, while they aren't an 880 or 990 (honestly, what could match that comfort?) you forget they are there and you wind up with a huge smile on your face because you know, inherently, this is how music should sound. songs that i've listened to 300 or more times before finally sound correct. i know that's about as objective as it gets, but there's a gut feeling that what i'm listening to is truly the purest, most wonderful sound... i could go on and on, but the bottom line is, if you can afford em, even if you think you're a basshead and the pro 990s + BD cable are it for you, the D7ks will probably surprise you in a very positive way. i could definitely keep going, and if there's any particular bits that i didn't mention please ask and i'll do my best to respond.
 
bottom line: the D7k's sound signature is very very similar to the 990/600s. imagine 990s with more bass presence, extension, detail, and slam, and a bit less treble, and you're there. the D7ks make the pro 900's sound metallic, boomy, and scooped.


I totally agree with a lot of what you said, the only thing I have to disagree with is I find the denons to have a colored sound signature, which isn't a bad thing, its just not natural IMO. Try the LCD 2's  and you'll find the denons colored without a doubt. But I like the denons because they have a colored sound signature, and not as fabricated as the Pro 900. I too had the Pro 900's for a while and just couldn't believe it when some people said it was a great all around headphone. I couldn't live with all that mid/hi bass, the denons are more sub bass which I prefer, make a more fun sound signature.
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 3:34 PM Post #4,103 of 7,464
I love my D7000. They look beautiful and they are so comfortable. Light as feather. The sound IS colored and fantastic bass! But LCD 2 is my king now! Absolutely everything I want. None of my headphones beat it.
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 4:16 PM Post #4,105 of 7,464
Different strokes for different folks.
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 4:56 PM Post #4,106 of 7,464
quite. having never heard any of the other top-tier phones, i'm not really fit to compare them. i bet the LCD-2 would make me see the D7k's in a different way, and who knows, i might do that someday. for now, and for a while hopefully (hah. this is head-fi!) i'll be enjoying my D7k's. i'd need to have over twice the money i invested in my current setup to do the LCD-2's properly though, as the E9 just wouldn't cut it. brilliant for the denons though.
 
Quote:
Different strokes for different folks.


 
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 6:10 PM Post #4,108 of 7,464


Quote:
Where's the cheapest place to buy a pair of these bad boys in the U.S. (NEW)?  I've seen a few posts here from people saying they got a pair for around $600.  Lowest I'm seeing is MyDigitalUniverse for $799.

Used to be J&R, with a phone call, was in the $650 range but MorbidToaster tells me that ain't so anymore.  Still, they might beat $799.  I'm waiting on a refurb unit from Dakmart that was under $500.  We'll see if I was wise or foolish this week.  Heh.
 
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 6:37 PM Post #4,109 of 7,464

You certainly got a deal on those refurbs as long as the warranty is right...Mine just sold for 675 in CONUS. :D
Quote:
Used to be J&R, with a phone call, was in the $650 range but MorbidToaster tells me that ain't so anymore.  Still, they might beat $799.  I'm waiting on a refurb unit from Dakmart that was under $500.  We'll see if I was wise or foolish this week.  Heh.
 
 



 
 
 
Jun 14, 2011 at 6:47 PM Post #4,110 of 7,464


Quote:
You certainly got a deal on those refurbs as long as the warranty is right...Mine just sold for 675 in CONUS. :D


 
 

Spose to have warranty.  
tongue_smile.gif
  Congrats on the sale!
 
 
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top