wickitom
New Head-Fier
Finally was able to get a good deal on the Ares II. What is a good headphone amp no more than $150? Eventually I will get something better. I will be using AKG K702 headphones. Thank you!
true NOS? where did you got that info? are you sure? isn't it just a dedicated NOS/OS button?Did you buy from Vinshine? In the past Alvin sent out new versions even if you ordered a new one. And was very lenient with trading in for higher-end models.
Unaware of this new development, I am somewhat glad I sold my Ares II last month. Surely this will drop the prices of second-hand Ares II units.
Had I known about this anniversary edition, I might have gone for it. I2S and true NOS are great features. The USB looks upgraded too, on a separate board now? I wonder if I2S is still reclocked -- hopefully not.
I read somewhere its 'true' NOS now...true NOS? where did you got that info? are you sure? isn't it just a dedicated NOS/OS button?
So apparently this is now called the Enyo. https://www.denafrips.com/enyo
Hello Alvin,
Confused? We are here to help
Enyo VS Ares II
- Ares II is renamed to Enyo
- They are identical inside-out
Read more here: link
I thought it would be replaced. Any DAC in the price range above $500 should have I2S port, including the closest competitor, Audio GD R2R-11 Mk2.Enyo VS Ares II
- Ares II is renamed to Enyo
- They are identical inside-out
and/or even better, have some kind of DDC integrated, from usb. or a really good usb integration.I thought it would be replaced. Any DAC in the price range above $500 should have I2S port, including the closest competitor, Audio GD R2R-11 Mk2.
If you mean galvanic isolation on USB port, you are right. It reduce a need for a DDC. Ares 2 do not have, Ares 12 neither. R2R-11 do have optionally, it brings price to $690, but it is not the way is done in more expensive R-8Mk2 ($1700). Still DI-20 bring improvements. Dealing with ground loops is not easy task.and/or even better, have some kind of DDC integrated, from usb. or a really good usb integration.
And what's wrong with Ares' usb implementation? It sounds great to me through the usb input.and/or even better, have some kind of DDC integrated, from usb. or a really good usb integration.
Well, it really depends on what "wrong" is considered. In my experience for example, if used a usb 3.0 cable on a usb 3.0 connection, it really sounds worse than following Sajunky advice of using a usb 2.0 hub, and connect the AresII there, using an old usb 2.0 cable.And what's wrong with Ares' usb implementation? It sounds great to me through the usb input.
If you have a good transport, than you don’t need DDC for Ares II.Well, it really depends on what "wrong" is considered. In my experience for example, if used a usb 3.0 cable on a usb 3.0 connection, it really sounds worse than following Sajunky advice of using a usb 2.0 hub, and connect the AresII there, using an old usb 2.0 cable.
A DDC would solve that. Seems to me quite awkward that after spending a bit under 1000€ on a DAC, you still have to be doing all those perks, so i have to connect my dac to my usb 2.0 keyboard to make it sounds as good as it can sound. The difference is quite noticeable, much cleaner doing the usb 2.0 trick. Desk is full of stuff like that. I would therefore would like to have some kind of DDAC instead, like a whole integrated thing from a simple usb connection. I know this is asking too much, but sometimes I wonder if it would not be kind of the same to use a cheap decent delta sigma akm dac, with a cheap linear power supply, and then filter it all by a valve preamp or buffer or... My understanding is that Schiit for example, maybe their multibit dacs not as good as this, and almost the same price, but, they have a better usb implementation. Some people in this forum even recommended to cascade ddc's (LOL!!!), not sure if that was trolling (very probably) or not. These people advised to use a ddc, connected to another ddc and then connect that to the dac, for the best sound possible, LOL.
Just trying to look for improvements, very happy with it since they updated the firmware and works now flawlessly with my mac, before it was huge headaches which every reboot of the computer, or just every time the standby button was pressed or it got stuck the whole system. Quite a headache. Not anymore since they updated the firmware a lot.
That's news to me.Well, it really depends on what "wrong" is considered. In my experience for example, if used a usb 3.0 cable on a usb 3.0 connection, it really sounds worse than following Sajunky advice of using a usb 2.0 hub, and connect the AresII there, using an old usb 2.0 cable.
A DDC would solve that. Seems to me quite awkward that after spending a bit under 1000€ on a DAC, you still have to be doing all those perks, so i have to connect my dac to my usb 2.0 keyboard to make it sounds as good as it can sound. The difference is quite noticeable, much cleaner doing the usb 2.0 trick. Desk is full of stuff like that. I would therefore would like to have some kind of DDAC instead, like a whole integrated thing from a simple usb connection. I know this is asking too much, but sometimes I wonder if it would not be kind of the same to use a cheap decent delta sigma akm dac, with a cheap linear power supply, and then filter it all by a valve preamp or buffer or... My understanding is that Schiit for example, maybe their multibit dacs not as good as this, and almost the same price, but, they have a better usb implementation. Some people in this forum even recommended to cascade ddc's (LOL!!!), not sure if that was trolling (very probably) or not. These people advised to use a ddc, connected to another ddc and then connect that to the dac, for the best sound possible, LOL.
Just trying to look for improvements, very happy with it since they updated the firmware and works now flawlessly with my mac, before it was huge headaches which every reboot of the computer, or just every time the standby button was pressed or it got stuck the whole system. Quite a headache. Not anymore since they updated the firmware a lot.