roderickvd
100+ Head-Fier
No, it is not a must. I understand it might have come across when I said “problem solved” but it is necessary only when you have a ground loop.The TOPPING is a must for the Ares or is it required only when there's actually an audible distortion/noise problem?
I had no ground loop, but bought one to satisfy my audiophile curiosity. Measurements show that there is a good 20 dB of noise attenuation and harmonics even in the absence of a ground loop. Though measurable, I admit that I cannot hear it — only logical since the Ares’ own noise has been measured well below the threshold of human hearing.
Expectation bias is with everyone.Anyone insisting that USB is ‘the way’ based on science/logical thinking (I understand about USB Async, is in part why I have a Grace m903), and then goes to a lot of effort/spending to improve it… ‘sound logic’.
I would say the semantics are that all transmission methods have issues. Which is where I find the beauty in the audio hobby: it’s all about compromises.The semantics are that most digital transmission methods have issues,..
This is sound advice (no pun intended). Implementations differ and so do personal preferences. As always, I just try to contribute by sharing engineering knowledge, then to each to pass his or her own judgement.Depending on any given piece of hardwares’ design, any given input method may sound better (test your own setup, PLEASE!)
You are right on the voltage levels to make it ones or zeros, but otherwise USB works differently from what you describe. There is no sort of lossy error correction. USB packets contain a CRC (a “check” value calculated from the actual payload, to see if the packet was received correctly). The USB client sends the host a confirmation when a packet was received successfully with a matching CRC. In the absence of such an acknowledgement, the host retransmits the package. If the cable or connection is poor, and too many packets are dropped, you will hear skipping. Packets are either received with full integrity, or they are not, they are not mutated.but given most work on some silly fallacy that digital is transmitted digitally (over USB it is a wavelength, with peaks and trowels that have to align accurately in order to be interpreted as digital ‘on/off’ (one/zero), and is why USB cable quality VERY MUCH MATTERS (qualifier being: into setups with enough capability to resolve the differences).. those high/low points, “eyelets” of info can easily get ‘out of sync’ becoming misread, where zero becomes a one or vice versa… sure error correction can make up some of it, but absolute audio information is easily lost (bass note definition, transient timings, the microdetails that give a stage its depth etc)
Indeed battery powered devices are by nature free from ground and mains noise so they are perfect in that regard. Of course like you say always test your system, because switching circuitry in them can and will still inject noise on connections (particularly ICs). But less so than noisy PCs and such, that’s for sure!I have ‘nice‘ USB cables, and regen units and am happy ‘doing the dance‘ of bouncing USB through multiple links (if need be), but I also run USB direct from battery isolated DAPs that internally have much consideration and design given to power isolation into particular circuits
Although I don’t find much in the argument that USB audio cannot or will never be good because USB was not invented for it — we could make a list of the greatest inventions that were intended for a different purpose — I am totally with you that I2S with a great master clock really is the best you can get. Unfortunately all Denafrips DACs reclock I2S signals too and so are limited by the quality of their own clock.It will never be I2S over a dedicated cable method designed for digital audio etc..
Figure I’ll post them here for all to enjoy, I’m only the messenger and just kinda curious to hear your thoughts on them. Some of the comments felt it helped but mighta just been the placebo affect.
I’m usually more diplomatic but let me say that this is nonsense. I will go out on a limb and say that electronics can be microphonic in the presence of loudspeakers, which is the basis for all matters anti-vibration, but tuning a chassis is just nonsense.
I think that @sajunky provided a good factual description of how things work. And again everyone looks through the glasses of their own choosing.@sajunky ‘yes’ (glad you are raising awareness of what is involved with USB, and I would say you speak with rosey coloured glasses, and WANT USB to be ‘all that’..)
Almost any: at least those with good shielding, preferably with ferrite beads, and good fitting of connectors. This guarantees high noise rejection.from a cheaper chain (don’t need to use super nice USB cables to get ‘close to equal’ digital tranmission quality) (but that is leaving the elephant in the room out of the discussion- clearly you believe that ANY USB cable is ‘good enough’?!)
As do I. I hold no grudges against coax or Toslink, and encourage anyone to choose what they love the music with most. Just want to be transparent on what’s the deal with USB.For a budget DAC, I am ‘all for USB’ (if it sounds better).. but for a nice DAC, I’d certainly encourage testing.. (the feedback I get via PM is ’thankyou’ (COAX was a massive upgrade))
I have no horse in this race.. I can do both and happily do the one that works best (for me)