If only consumers would stop buying products from companies who are alleged to be greedy........if only consumers would stop buying products at higher prices for purely cosmetic "special" editions.....if only consumers would stop buying products from pure hype advertisements disguised as reviews......if only consumers would trust their own ears instead of someone else's.....
See a pattern?
The problem isn't people buying stuff from greedy people. Everyone is greedy. It's part of what makes (and has made) the world go 'round. The problem I have is with people in magic-oriented industries such as audio taking every marketing prestige as fact. Or, reviewers's words as fact. Or, believing that it is all about your own ears. No, it is about your preferences. And absolutes do exist. If you like a sound, there is no absolute counter that can tabulate why, or how. It is anecdotal and idiosyncratic to you.
But there are factual divisions: how much DR, how much harmonic distortion, how much IMD, how much stereo separation, how much noise. In those cases, it doesn't matter what your ears hear. When facts are called for, opinions need to be shut out. After they are presented, you can argue what is necessary _for you_ but you cannot factually argue 88dB is better than 120dB.
Now, I am a firm supporter in better measuring gear, but am realistic. At normal/safe listening levels, none of the gear we rally behind comes close to even clipping 16-bit spec. And it all comes down to anecdotal stories. If you, like me, prefer to listen to an iPhone 4s, great. Or, an AK380. Or a DP-X1. But don't claim that one is truly better at the ear unless you have a way to prove it.
In the end, it is about enjoyment. But enjoyment is personal, not factual, not universal.
I freely admit, and can account for the inadequacies of the iPhone 4s at maximum performance. At normal listening levels, it is on par with the best DAPs out there. Even before I knew that, I preferred its size over larger devices, its speed, and its UI. But those were personal preferences. As is my preference toward its 'sound signature' over the iPhone 6, though I've not put them back to back in a blind ABX.
What I am doing now is admitting personal bias. But I'm not claiming it as fact. The problem I hope that many of us see is that we believe in magic and distrust objective measurements. We apply digital camera understanding of 'resolution' and 'bit depth' to music, despite the two being mutually exclusive, not to mention being slaved to incompatible examples.
Factually, I will claim that the Mojo is the best-testing portable battery-powered source device I've tested. By a notable margin. Does that mean it will 'sound better' to you, me, or anyone else? No. The feel of its eyes will put people off. So will the name. As will a million things unrelated to any of the above or below. Or, they could attract a person. If we can't recognise attractive tendencies and belief in magic, we are in the same position as people that believe in a flat earth.
So: Mojo: best product of 2015, if not for its at-the-ear SQ, its actual performance. My ears are not up to spec. Neither are yours. Nor are anyone's. But the peace of mind its performance brings is priceless.
Edit: I've been drinking new-year's cool-aid. I won't attempt to fix the grammatical errors in my post. There's a good spirit in it all, but the message is murky because of the grog.