ChrisGB
100+ Head-Fier
I'm trying not to talk myself into a Dave.It's the capital investment that stops people. We can't get daily financing terms. Otherwise I would have a Dave. I keep asking @Rob Watts and he says 'no'.
I'm trying not to talk myself into a Dave.It's the capital investment that stops people. We can't get daily financing terms. Otherwise I would have a Dave. I keep asking @Rob Watts and he says 'no'.
I'm trying not to talk myself into a Dave.
I am an engineer my self. Would you disagree?As a battery scientist, I feel this one in my gut. That hurt.
Because batteries in principle are compromised devises. They are big, heavy, with questionable long term stability & performance, deteriorate, are not sustainable, are expensive and at some point in time they will die and you will need to handle the waste. The only reason we are using batteries is because there is no alternative and wireless transmitted electricity based on Tesla's theory is not there yet.?? Why?
Scary thoughtYou should be careful or you're going to get a dozen private messages from men named Dave.
Actually, I would strongly disagree. But this is a matter of perspective.I am an engineer my self. Would you disagree?
Because batteries in principle are compromised devises. They are big, heavy, with questionable long term stability
Is this why people that spend 10k on a vynyl player would do anything to get it battery poweredBecause batteries in principle are compromised devises. They are big, heavy, with questionable long term stability & performance, deteriorate, are not sustainable, are expensive and at some point in time they will die and you will need to handle the waste. The only reason we are using batteries is because there is no alternative and wireless transmitted electricity based on Tesla's theory is not there yet.
Will outlast me but how much it will cost me. I am not saying that batteries bring no benefits. I am just saying is our only viable solution. Let me ask you something. If you had wirelessly transited electricity based on Tesla's theory, would you opt for batteries? The only reason we use batteries is because there is no other alternative for mobile devices. If batteries were great we would be powering our amplifiers also with batteries. Is an evil we have to live with. At least for now.With respect to 'long term stability'; I can design and build you cells that will outlast you. The compromise comes from other decisions, not the technology.
But I'm taking this into the weeds. So I'll stop talking about batteries, @ChrisGB 's safety, and wanting to own a Dave.
Rechargeable batteries I would call environmentally friendly!Will outlast me but how much it will cost me. I am not saying that batteries bring no benefits. I am just saying is our only viable solution. Let me ask you something. If you had wirelessly transited electricity based on Tesla's theory, would you opt for batteries? The only reason we use batteries is because there is no other alternative for mobile devices. If batteries were great we would be powering our amplifiers also with batteries. Is an evil we have to live with. At least for now.
I was thinking the exact same thing the other day.Chord could have implemented full USB-C for both data and charging, and kept Poly backward compatibility with a simple passive adaptor such as this.
If ever a new Poly should be conjured up, it could also adopt USB-C and stay compatible.
Really, was it that hard? :
Mojo2+Poly wouldn't fit in existing Mojo cases anyways! new cases could be made a few milimeters longer.
The toslink and coax plugs on Poly won’t both fit into your adapter and fit into Mojo2. The adapter would need to be quite a bit thicker, and necessitate a new case, but it could be done. Assuming now having 3 pieces would be stable. Maybe even add more battery into it!Chord could have implemented full USB-C for both data and charging, and kept Poly backward compatibility with a simple passive adaptor such as this.
If ever a new Poly should be conjured up, it could also adopt USB-C and stay compatible.
Really, was it that hard? :
Mojo2+Poly wouldn't fit in existing Mojo cases anyways! new cases could be made a few milimeters longer.
Come on!The toslink and coax plugs on Poly won’t both fit into your adapter and fit into Mojo2. The adapter would need to be quite a bit thicker, and necessitate a new case, but it could be done. Assuming now having 3 pieces would be stable. Maybe even add more battery into it!
@Kentajalli, I follow your suggestions seriously, in the spirit of improvement and experimentation. Of course I take what you say as concrete, since you usually are!Come on!
It was just a crude suggestion, saying it could have been done.
If you are really nitpicking , look closely, the ends of Toslink and coax inserts are tapered in, they could go into the bottom part of the new insets, no?
OK not 8mm, make it 10mm.
Old Mojo+Poly cases would not fit new Mojo2 anyways.
Little hex locking screws on the adaptor could fix it to Poly firmly - Poly-Mojo is not all that stable, the case or a sleeve takes care of that.