best combo-dap for chord mojo?
Just choose a reliable device with a smooth operating system.
best combo-dap for chord mojo?
I never get these kinds of questions. The source just passes 1's and 0's to the Mojo, so there shouldn't be a "best", just whatever you want to use that can pass audio digitally.
Am I missing something?
Does it mean that FiiO's X5II output isn't bit perfect, when the sound through the Mojo is affected by the EQ?The following equalizer setting on the FiiO X5 II for the SE846 specifically for the Mojo sounds fabulous:
If you have a FiiO player and need numbers (from 31 Hz to 16 kHz):
0.....–1.4.....–1.....–1.....–1.....–2.....–3.8.....–4.8.....–1.....–0.8
Thanks. I understand the part that the Hugo, Mojo and X5 ii will all sound different on the analogue level. My question is about the vice versa scenario: if the DSP changes the sample values, does also the basic pre-tuned tonality of the player also affects the Mojo's output? Or to put it simpler, do different daps with the EQ off, all sound the same with the Mojo, regardless of their pre-tuned, possibly some dsp involved, tonality?Not sure how to interpret your question.
Of course the digital signal isn't «bit perfect» anymore, since the DSP changes the sample values. That doesn't mean it's corrupted by any means – it now looks as if the mastering engineer had done some corresponding equalizing beforehand.
With say the Hugo₂ instead of the Mojo the EQ curve would look slightly different, and with the X5 II alone slightly different again – because the analogue signals from all of them have a slightly deviating (perceived) tonal balance.
DAPs should have no sound tuning by themselves – they only have to channel the digital signals from the data carriers (e.g. microSDXC cards) to a DAC. So the player has no sound on its own, particularly if it transmits the signal bit-perfectly, which means without resampling, which is the norm, unlike with computer operating systems. At least that's the theory. In practice not all digital source devices sound the same, according to my experience even CD transports can sound different. Current knowledge attributes the differences to jitter and RFI – therefore not all DACs are affected to the same degree. My Hugo₁ sounded better with the FiiO X5 II as source than with the original X5 – the sound was cleaner. The DAVE on the other hand showed no such difference during a brief comparison – but I would have to do it again to be sure.Thanks. I understand the part that the Hugo, Mojo and X5 ii will all sound different on the analogue level. My question is about the vice versa scenario: if the DSP changes the sample values, does also the basic pre-tuned tonality of the player also affects the Mojo's output? Or to put it simpler, do different daps with the EQ off, all sound the same with the Mojo, regardless of their pre-tuned, possibly some dsp involved, tonality?
Thanks a lot, great explanation. That was exactly the missing piece of the puzzle I was looking for.DAPs should have no sound tuning by themselves – they only have to channel the digital signals from the data carriers (e.g. microSDXC cards) to a DAC. So the player has no sound on its own, particularly if it transmits the signal bit-perfectly, which means without resampling, which is the norm, unlike with computer operating systems. At least that's the theory. In practice not all digital source devices sound the same, according to my experience even CD transports can sound different. Current knowledge attributes the differences to jitter and RFI – therefore not all DACs are affected to the same degree. My Hugo₁ sounded better with the FiiO X5 II as source than with the original X5 – the sound was cleaner. The DAVE on the other hand showed no such difference during a brief comparison – but I would have to do it again to be sure.
Note that «bit perfection» is of relevance only in terms of resampling (up- or downsampling) – or the absence of it, respectively. DSPs and digital volume controls can't fulfill their tasks if they're not allowed to modify the sample values.
I just received the Mojo case. It's an original Chord one.
However really surprised to see it has a magnet to close the case. Why would you want a magnet next to audio electronics? I might be wrong but wouldn't it interfere. ... Also if the Mojo was dropped while in the case. I fear the magnet would pop open and the Mojo fall out. (Not that I intend dropping the Mojo, but accidents happen.)
EDIT: With Mojo case being made of aluminium, it probably blocks magnetism. At least that is what I came up with, after a google.
i'm currently using my mojo as a dac with my LG Oled tv for late night tv / concert watching.
(loving it)
using optical out from tv to mojo and then to my fostex th X00 cans.
question for anyone doing similar or familiar with the iFi spdif ?
are you using it in in this configuration...this is where i'm trying to find out how to implement it.
https://ifi-audio.com/products/spdif-ipurifier/
I have already introduced my 3D printed case for the Mojo-HiBy R3 combo, and I have been enjoying this little magic sound brick a lot!
But for taking it with me I had to wrap it in a towel and put it in a bag for protection, so I went back to the deawing board and came up with a transport box that keeps the Mojo and R3 perfectly safe. And here is the first functional sample!