Feb 18, 2025 at 12:36 PM Post #7,067 of 7,148
Does anyone else watch Hans Beekhuyzen on YouTube? He’s made some interesting videos over the last few months about the reasons why network switches and Ethernet filters can impact audio. Much appears to do with jitter. I’ve found it interesting to note my own experiences here. Even though Rob Watts repeatedly reports here that Qutest is for all intents and purposes immune to jitter, I have found a positive impact of placing an audiophile Ethernet switch and filter in between my router and my streamer that feeds my Qutest. Has anyone else had any positive or negative experiences using different Ethernet switches with server/streamer sources connected to their Qutest ?
 
Last edited:
Feb 18, 2025 at 2:13 PM Post #7,068 of 7,148
Does anyone else watch Hans Beekhuyzen on YouTube? He’s made some interesting videos over the last few months about the reasons why network switches and Ethernet filters can impact audio. Much appears to do with jitter. I’ve found it interesting to note my own experiences here. Even though Rob Watts repeatedly reports here that Qutest is for all intents and purposes immune to jitter, I have found a positive impact of placing an audiophile Ethernet switch and filter in between my router and my streamer that feeds my Qutest. Has anyone else had any positive or negative experiences using different Ethernet switches with server/streamer sources connected to their Qutest ?
I usually just go Wifi, that way there is no cable connected to any switch, or router. You have to be careful with what you hear, if you connect an "audiophile switch" to the DAC, it may introduce electrical noise and noise floor modulation, that can sound as an improvement at first, as it adds brightness and an artificial perception of extra detail. However, it's all artificial and over time it will start bothering you, I have seen the measurements of all Chord DACs when extra jitter is added to test them and it is all rejected, the Qutest and other Rob Watts-designed DACs have amazing jitter rejection measurements. Use a good streamer on wifi and use Toslink, it usually is better than USB as it has complete RFI and EMI and all noise rejection, Rob recommends Toslink and I agree after trying all other inputs. Toslink also decouples the ground plane of the streamer, so it doesn't allow the streamer to pollute the ground plane of your DAC.
 
Feb 18, 2025 at 3:03 PM Post #7,069 of 7,148
I usually just go Wifi, that way there is no cable connected to any switch, or router. You have to be careful with what you hear, if you connect an "audiophile switch" to the DAC, it may introduce electrical noise and noise floor modulation, that can sound as an improvement at first, as it adds brightness and an artificial perception of extra detail. However, it's all artificial and over time it will start bothering you, I have seen the measurements of all Chord DACs when extra jitter is added to test them and it is all rejected, the Qutest and other Rob Watts-designed DACs have amazing jitter rejection measurements. Use a good streamer on wifi and use Toslink, it usually is better than USB as it has complete RFI and EMI and all noise rejection, Rob recommends Toslink and I agree after trying all other inputs. Toslink also decouples the ground plane of the streamer, so it doesn't allow the streamer to pollute the ground plane of your DAC.
Thanks for your thoughts - yes I have read the entire thread actually so am well aware of RW’s preference/recommendation to use optical- alas my Innuos server/streamer is usb only- it’s actually Ethernet only as well, no wi-fi. I suppose I could use a DDC to try to get optical out into the Qutest, haven’t fully explored that.
 
Feb 18, 2025 at 8:00 PM Post #7,070 of 7,148
Thanks for your thoughts - yes I have read the entire thread actually so am well aware of RW’s preference/recommendation to use optical- alas my Innuos server/streamer is usb only- it’s actually Ethernet only as well, no wi-fi. I suppose I could use a DDC to try to get optical out into the Qutest, haven’t fully explored that.
Try a good DDC and let me know what you think, it would be a cool experiment.
 
Feb 19, 2025 at 1:06 PM Post #7,071 of 7,148
Hey guys - I’m a fan of the audiophile label 2L and they have some amazing recordings available to purchase as hi res downloads. Some of my favourites were recorded straight to DXD and are offered as DXD downloads. But can the Qutest play DXD format ?
 
Feb 19, 2025 at 2:09 PM Post #7,072 of 7,148
Feb 19, 2025 at 5:04 PM Post #7,074 of 7,148
Dsd over pcm. The qutest is pcm only. Use hqplayer to upsample/convert. Innuous will also act as an naa endpoint. I want one of those...lol.
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2025 at 11:19 AM Post #7,075 of 7,148
Dsd over pcm. The qutest is pcm only. Use hqplayer to upsample/convert. Innuous will also act as an naa endpoint. I want one of those...lol.
I do not think this is accurate.

“The Qutest supports PCM files from 44.1kHz/16-bit all the way up to 768kHz/32-bit as well as natively supporting DSD to DSD512.”

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/chord-electronics-qutest-dac/

DSD support: Native playback supported. DSD64 (Single) to DSD512 (Octa-DSD)”

https://chordelectronics.co.uk/product/qutest

kn
 
Feb 20, 2025 at 11:21 AM Post #7,076 of 7,148
I do not think this is accurate.

“The Qutest supports PCM files from 44.1kHz/16-bit all the way up to 768kHz/32-bit as well as natively supporting DSD to DSD512.”

https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/chord-electronics-qutest-dac/

DSD support: Native playback supported. DSD64 (Single) to DSD512 (Octa-DSD)”

https://chordelectronics.co.uk/product/qutest

kn
Well I can confirm that the Native DSD setting in Innuos does NOT work with Qutest - Innuos is a Linux based server so maybe that is the reason
 
Mar 2, 2025 at 4:39 AM Post #7,079 of 7,148
Hi there,

I recently tried Chord and was impressed by the sound quality.

Yesterday, I designed and printed a stand for it, which turned out quite well.

If anyone is interested, I can share the file.
 

Attachments

  • 20250302_103125~2.jpg
    20250302_103125~2.jpg
    304.3 KB · Views: 0
  • 20250302_095748~2.jpg
    20250302_095748~2.jpg
    312.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 20250302_103130~2.jpg
    20250302_103130~2.jpg
    300.4 KB · Views: 0
  • 20250302_095501~2.jpg
    20250302_095501~2.jpg
    202.9 KB · Views: 0
  • 20250302_095508~2.jpg
    20250302_095508~2.jpg
    318.5 KB · Views: 0

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top