Jun 8, 2018 at 1:13 PM Post #1,577 of 7,211
I am using a 12" Macbook for hi-res files and have a dedicated CD player with optical out to the Qutest.

I must say now after a week of thoroughly running it.. its a major improvement on the Chord Mojo
Ecxcuse my ignorance but I need to ask this question . If I connect my Cd player via optical out from the player into optical on my Qutest will that result in Qutest actually playing the disc from the player even if it as in my case has its own inbuilt dac?
One of my old Cd players a Zindak SCD 2 SACD player has optical out.
Or will it only work from a transport only cd drive ?
Cheers Christer
 
Last edited:
Jun 8, 2018 at 1:28 PM Post #1,579 of 7,211
Mmm, I wonder did I keep my Nakamichi from the 90's
 
Jun 8, 2018 at 1:28 PM Post #1,580 of 7,211
Ecxcuse my ignorance but I need to ask this question . If I connect my Cd player via optical out from the player into optical on my Qutest will that resusult in Qutest actually playing the disc from the player even if it as in my case has its own inbuilt dac?
One of my old Cd players a Zindak SCD 2 SACD player has optical out.
Or will it only work from a transport only cd drive ?
Cheers Christer
It should work ok as a transport. If you have the user manual, does it indicate if the optical output is 192khz or limited to say 96khz?
 
Jun 8, 2018 at 1:35 PM Post #1,581 of 7,211
I tried to connect my old CD Cary 303 to 2Qute by optical cable QED Reference versus coaxial vintage Belkin Pro (blue).
Coaxial cable sounded much more natural. Optical cable sounded cold and glassy in comparison.

In contrast, Mojo sounded more detailed with QED Reference optical cable.
Maybe it was, because lusher and more muddy Mojo sound.
But 2Qute didn't benefit from optical cable, it sounds transparent and detailed enough with coaxial.
 
Last edited:
Jun 9, 2018 at 2:19 AM Post #1,584 of 7,211
Thanks for quick reply. I bought some music that was 44.1/24 just wondering if I should have gotten 96/24

You have two issues here - the sample rate conversion from 96k to 44.1, and that fact it is a lower sample rate. I am not bothered too much by the lower sample rate, so long as it is binary multiples, but I am bothered by sample rate conversion, which adds lots of distortion and noise and degrades transient timing. So my rule of thumb is if it is a 96k original, buy that rather than the 44.1 version.
 
Jun 9, 2018 at 12:46 PM Post #1,586 of 7,211
You have two issues here - the sample rate conversion from 96k to 44.1, and that fact it is a lower sample rate. I am not bothered too much by the lower sample rate, so long as it is binary multiples, but I am bothered by sample rate conversion, which adds lots of distortion and noise and degrades transient timing. So my rule of thumb is if it is a 96k original, buy that rather than the 44.1 version.

Thanks so much, is there a source of "original" sample rates for source materials? I don't think HDtracks or Acoustic Sounds tells you.

--Chris
 
Jun 10, 2018 at 12:12 AM Post #1,588 of 7,211
I think for rock/pop it is very difficult to download original recordings - much of the time I can only get MP3 as downloads, which I refuse to buy.

99% of my purchases are classical, and I get them from Chandos website, and Presto classical. Both generally offer options to buy the original master recording, normally 96k. I will always buy the 96 in preference to the 44.1, mainly because of the sample rate conversion issue.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top