bmfmarius
New Head-Fier
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2016
- Posts
- 18
- Likes
- 16
So sad, so true!2. You need to spend a lot of time, money and experience to computer audio to overperform CD transport sound quality (even of average transport).
So sad, so true!2. You need to spend a lot of time, money and experience to computer audio to overperform CD transport sound quality (even of average transport).
Ecxcuse my ignorance but I need to ask this question . If I connect my Cd player via optical out from the player into optical on my Qutest will that result in Qutest actually playing the disc from the player even if it as in my case has its own inbuilt dac?I am using a 12" Macbook for hi-res files and have a dedicated CD player with optical out to the Qutest.
I must say now after a week of thoroughly running it.. its a major improvement on the Chord Mojo
It should work ok as a transport. If you have the user manual, does it indicate if the optical output is 192khz or limited to say 96khz?Ecxcuse my ignorance but I need to ask this question . If I connect my Cd player via optical out from the player into optical on my Qutest will that resusult in Qutest actually playing the disc from the player even if it as in my case has its own inbuilt dac?
One of my old Cd players a Zindak SCD 2 SACD player has optical out.
Or will it only work from a transport only cd drive ?
Cheers Christer
Yes coax is better! But a good cable is mandatory, and matching impedanceCoaxial cable sounded much more natural. Optical cable sounded cold and glassy in comparison.
Thanks for quick reply. I bought some music that was 44.1/24 just wondering if I should have gotten 96/24
I tried to connect my old CD Cary 303 to 2Qute by optical cable QED Reference versus coaxial vintage Belkin Pro (blue).
Coaxial cable sounded much more natural. Optical cable sounded cold and glassy in comparison.
You have two issues here - the sample rate conversion from 96k to 44.1, and that fact it is a lower sample rate. I am not bothered too much by the lower sample rate, so long as it is binary multiples, but I am bothered by sample rate conversion, which adds lots of distortion and noise and degrades transient timing. So my rule of thumb is if it is a 96k original, buy that rather than the 44.1 version.