USB decrapifier for a portable system?
I am just adding some information that people told me to do since I am not into H2 sound sig.
USB decrapifier for a portable system?
Just for the record, I am using the Hugo 2 in my main hi-fi system, I am not using it with cans, so using crossfeed is not an option.
Although my main DAC is a Metrum Acoustics R2R NOS DAC, I also extensively used the Mojo, which I really like, so I am somewhat familiar with the Chord sound at least to a certain degree.
I will give it some more time, although things are only getting worse instead of getting better. Maybe Hugo2's way of reproducing music is just not my thing, I don't know. I feel there is something unnatural about it, and I don't know what it is.
I am not so sure about "adjusting my brain to it". When you go to a live concert, you don't have to "adjust" your brain to it, do you?
Anyway, I don't want to insist too much on this issue, lots of people seem to enjoy the Hugo2 really much, so maybe the problem is me.
It is because people like musickid have achieved such amazing results. I just think it might be a good idea for people not to dismiss the sound immediately because they somehow fail to understand/comprehend it. They could be rewarded if they give it more time and perhaps look at upgrades elsewhere in their audio chain. Pre owned Mscalers are apparently becoming available so that might be a good place to start along with some premium grade headphones.
I dont think this is about knocking to Hugo2 and people coming out to defend it. What it looks like to me is that he is not used to this kind of sound and would be happy to let it go so soon, where as i would give this a good chance just as with anything from any company. Some of the very best enjoyable gear i've owned had a growing period where as the ones with the wow factor became tiring and disappointing in the long run.
No, I will advise him in good faith, what I believe is right and truthful.It’s not that I don’t believe in it. Infact I have experienced my brain play tricks on my perception quite a few times. But when things are black and white, like when Hugo2’s tonality is clearly not the listener’s preference, it probably might help to advise him to return/sell the unit and move on.
USB decrapifier for a portable system?
All of my kidding aside: Maybe it doesn't have the right synergy with your system. Nothing wrong with that. It works well for me with my cans, and has given me joy since my first moment with it. But, if it isn't right for you, by all means let it go. You could give it a bit more time as others have said. But, it's up to you, of course. Good luck improving your system.Just for the record, I am using the Hugo 2 in my main hi-fi system, I am not using it with cans, so using crossfeed is not an option.
Although my main DAC is a Metrum Acoustics R2R NOS DAC, I also extensively used the Mojo, which I really like, so I am somewhat familiar with the Chord sound at least to a certain degree.
I will give it some more time, although things are only getting worse instead of getting better. Maybe Hugo2's way of reproducing music is just not my thing, I don't know. I feel there is something unnatural about it, and I don't know what it is.
I am not so sure about "adjusting my brain to it". When you go to a live concert, you don't have to "adjust" your brain to it, do you?
Anyway, I don't want to insist too much on this issue, lots of people seem to enjoy the Hugo2 really much, so maybe the problem is me.
I have to agree about giving things a chance. My experience with the LCD-X is a prime example of a piece of gear that disappointed me at first. Now I wouldn't part with them. But, as I said above: If it doesn't fit into his system...Well, its not like Musickid didn't like the standalone H2, but started liking it after he added the HMS. He was in love with his H2 even before adding the HMS to his chain. While the HMS improves on a ton of aspects and boosts the realism of the device, the tonality would very much still be that of the Hugo 2 (speaking based on my experience with the Blu2 and Dave). So if someone didn't like the H2 because of its "surgical" tonality, I doubt an HMS could help.
@Hooster , what Julien is saying is, he prefers the tonality of the Mojo over the Hugo 2, even though Hugo 2 performs better than the Mojo in the non-tonal aspects.
Sure, if the device sounds slightly different from your preference, it makes sense to give it some time to see if grows on you. But in every case I have seen, where the sound was clearly not the person's cup of tea on day one, no amount of brain burn-in or device burn-in has helped. Advising the person to return the device, might actually at the least help him not skip the return window. Advising things such as brain burn-in is only delaying the inevitable.
I'm not here to police what one must and mustn't do on the forum. I have come to this thread numerous times in search of information. But it is so damn difficult to find the relevant posts, when most of the thread is filled with hyperbole or people talking about brain-burn-in or how HMS blew them away.
How are you feeding your Hugo 2? USB? Curious if you've tried optical?Anyway, I don't want to insist too much on this issue, lots of people seem to enjoy the Hugo2 really much, so maybe the problem is me.
How are you feeding your Hugo 2? USB? Curious if you've tried optical?
I too find the optical to be best for both mojo and hugo 2.Tried them all. The USB being the worst and the optical one being the most acceptable among them.
I too find the optical to be best for both mojo and hugo 2.
I am lucky to have an optical output on my old PC.Yes, and I find the difference between filters to be more discernible when using optical.
Edit: Of course, this also has to do with the transport I am using: for USB I am using a notebook, while for optical I am using a streamer.
Tried them all. The USB being the worst and the optical one being the most acceptable among them.
I too find the optical to be best for both mojo and hugo 2.