audionewbi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2010
- Posts
- 11,127
- Likes
- 7,206
This post deserve front page status.
I have been listening to the Dave using a CAPS v3 Zuma (Computer Audiophile Pocket Server) with Audiophile Optimizer software, in conjunction with Jplay, the sound is just so awesome. I also listened to cd's and they sounded clear and detailed as well. I have Magnapan 3.7i speakers (Emotive XPR-1 mono amps) (Epik Empire Dual Subwoofers) and the sound is very open and very detailed, the bass hits you hard in the chest, a much fuller sound then the $30k Magico speakers, which I listened to at the high end audio store. I really can't tell if the Dave is breaking in, because to me it has sounded great from the beginning. I use Cardas cables as well as Audioquest Diamond cables. I also use a Panamax power cleaner to filter any electrical anomalies, further I use Triode power cables through out. I just wanted to give an idea of the equipment I am using, so you know where I'm coming from in my comments.
You have a highly optimized music server and I have been waiting for someone like you who uses a CAPS type device tweaked with AO, JPlay, etc. on the DAVE to comment. I presume you've probably connected it to a good outboard linear PSU? Can you comment whether your CAPS device sounds any better with the DAVE compared to your CD player and for that matter, a basic PC/Mac if you've tried it? Even if they all sound good, are there unique sonic characteristics of each that shine through for you that allow you to identify them?
Having heard it for myself, I have bought into Rob's claim that the DAVE is immune to source jitter but I have a hard time believing that all sources will sound exactly the same. Those that know me know I have done quite a bit of testing of music servers and without question, each server has it's own character and are amenable to tweaks. For example, with something like an Aurender X100, the difference between using the X100 stock vs upgrading its integrated switching PSU to an outboard aftermarket LPSU can be very profound. Bigger and tighter bass, smoother details and quieter noise floor and the difference isn't so subtle. I have also come to appreciate the tonal character of something like an Auralic Aries vs an Aurender N10, a TotalDac d1-server, or CAD CAT server (ie the TotalDAC d1-server has rich tonal body, the Aurender N10 layers details exquisitely, etc) that allow me to single them out. I struggle to see how these identifying characteristics just all go away and how something like a really good PSU on the source won't matter when paired with the DAVE but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe a cheap $600 Auralic Aries Mini will sound as good as a $17,000 Aurender W20. If this is true, then the DAVE isn't transparent to the source, it is transparent to the source file.
You have a highly optimized music server and I have been waiting for someone like you who uses a CAPS type device tweaked with AO, JPlay, etc. on the DAVE to comment. I presume you've probably connected it to a good outboard linear PSU? Can you comment whether your CAPS device sounds any better with the DAVE compared to your CD player and for that matter, a basic PC/Mac if you've tried it? Even if they all sound good, are there unique sonic characteristics of each that shine through for you that allow you to identify them?
Having heard it for myself, I have bought into Rob's claim that the DAVE is immune to source jitter but I have a hard time believing that all sources will sound exactly the same. Those that know me know I have done quite a bit of testing of music servers and without question, each server has it's own character and are amenable to tweaks. For example, with something like an Aurender X100, the difference between using the X100 stock vs upgrading its integrated switching PSU to an outboard aftermarket LPSU can be very profound. Bigger and tighter bass, smoother details and quieter noise floor and the difference isn't so subtle. I have also come to appreciate the tonal character of something like an Auralic Aries vs an Aurender N10, a TotalDac d1-server, or CAD CAT server (ie the TotalDAC d1-server has rich tonal body, the Aurender N10 layers details exquisitely, etc) that allow me to single them out. I struggle to see how these identifying characteristics just all go away and how something like a really good PSU on the source won't matter when paired with the DAVE but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe a cheap $600 Auralic Aries Mini will sound as good as a $17,000 Aurender W20. If this is true, then the DAVE isn't transparent to the source, it is transparent to the source file.
Yes I use a HD plex like Mavwong, yes I think it does sound a lot better then my cd transport, yes better then a PC set up, but that sounds pretty good too, I agree with Mavwong, my mac mini sounded ok, not as good as my PC set up or the server set up with AO. I have not used a Aurender, but I heard a Auralic and that sounded very good with the Dave, hope that helped.
Hi m8Yes I use a HD plex like Mavwong, yes I think it does sound a lot better then my cd transport, yes better then a PC set up, but that sounds pretty good too, I agree with Mavwong, my mac mini sounded ok, not as good as my PC set up or the server set up with AO. I have not used a Aurender, but I heard a Auralic and that sounded very good with the Dave, hope that helped.
You have a highly optimized music server and I have been waiting for someone like you who uses a CAPS type device tweaked with AO, JPlay, etc. on the DAVE to comment. I presume you've probably connected it to a good outboard linear PSU? Can you comment whether your CAPS device sounds any better with the DAVE compared to your CD player and for that matter, a basic PC/Mac if you've tried it? Even if they all sound good, are there unique sonic characteristics of each that shine through for you that allow you to identify them?
Having heard it for myself, I have bought into Rob's claim that the DAVE is immune to source jitter but I have a hard time believing that all sources will sound exactly the same. Those that know me know I have done quite a bit of testing of music servers and without question, each server has it's own character and are amenable to tweaks. For example, with something like an Aurender X100, the difference between using the X100 stock vs upgrading its integrated switching PSU to an outboard aftermarket LPSU can be very profound. Bigger and tighter bass, smoother details and quieter noise floor and the difference isn't so subtle. I have also come to appreciate the tonal character of something like an Auralic Aries vs an Aurender N10, a TotalDac d1-server, or CAD CAT server (ie the TotalDAC d1-server has rich tonal body, the Aurender N10 layers details exquisitely, etc) that allow me to single them out. I struggle to see how these identifying characteristics just all go away and how something like a really good PSU on the source won't matter when paired with the DAVE but maybe I'm wrong. Maybe a cheap $600 Auralic Aries Mini will sound as good as a $17,000 Aurender W20. If this is true, then the DAVE isn't transparent to the source, it is transparent to the source file.
This post deserve front page status.
...and he have been testing the hole weekend with CAPS , Auralic Aries, and Macbook Pro , Iphone, and his conclusion was after switch btw input sources, it was very hard to hear small to any differences at all...
So if you buy a ultra expensive CAPS / Aurender , CAD , it does not play that big role any more guys !![]()
Hello Fellow Head-Fiers!Good news... We finally have our first review: http://www.hifistatement.net/tests/item/1678-chord-dave-teil-1?limitstart=0
STATEMENT
The Chord DAVE is a real exception-DAC, not only as regards his technique, which I will present to you in more detail in the second part of the article. So emotionally appealing or sometimes upsetting I have not been able to enjoy my music files. For me, the DAVE is simply the dream converter!
Hello Fellow Head-Fiers!Good news... We finally have our first review: http://www.hifistatement.net/tests/item/1678-chord-dave-teil-1?limitstart=0