CHORD ELECTRONICS DAVE
post-12689775
Post #3,482 of 14,584

Mython

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
8,760
Reaction score
3,381
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
8,760
Likes
3,381
 
Power DAC, a DAC with an output stage powerful enough to drive speakers directly.

That sounds like a killer DAC called Super DAVE
 
 
"He's a man with a mission to deliver the highest quality entertainment, at any cost!"
 
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Beolab
post-12691378
Post #3,483 of 14,584

mtoc

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
487
Reaction score
44
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Posts
487
Likes
44
Dave plus the digital 20W amp, now we really have a low distortion system to drive HE6.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12691548
Post #3,484 of 14,584

TheAttorney

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
May 25, 2008
Messages
1,579
Reaction score
596
Location
UK
Joined
May 25, 2008
Location
UK
Posts
1,579
Likes
596
A while back I commented that I thought I could hear subtle differences between optical cables to DAVE, with a background that I previously could hear big differences between digital cables to Yggy.
So here's an update:
 
With Nagra CDC to DAVE, I tried 3 optical cables: AQ Diamond still on loan; the stock "freebie" that came with DAVE; and a newly received Mapleshade that others here have strongly recommended. Like I said, the differences were now rather subtle, but still there. Further complicated by the Mapleshade appearing to be directional, as the maker strongly claims.
In short I felt that Mapleshade and AQ were broadly on the same level, with the Mapleshade slightly more focused and precise, and the AQ more analogue-in-a-good-way.
However, as the AQ was over 4 times the price, it was a no brainer to return it, so I did.
 
Next tried the Mapleshade against the freebie cable.  The latter had a similar analoguey signature as the AQ, but was a step down in quality - i.e. a touch woollier, a touch more shut in, and a touch more grain in the upper mids. So the Mapleshade stays in place. Whether or not some of this is my imagination is rather a moot point for me now, because I'm done with cable changes and, with a microRendu on its way, I'm moving on to try computer/server sources. I repeat that these cable differences were more subtle than that I had experienced with the Yggy.
 
And also more subtle than what happended next when my washing machine pads arrived!!!. That deserves it's own post later this weekend :)   
 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: Music Alchemist
post-12691919
Post #3,485 of 14,584

rkt31

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
443
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
1,536
Likes
443
hi, can anybody elaborate about various filters used in upsampling? chord uses fir with longer tap length, Hq player uses poly sinc and many others, schiit uses closed form filter. I was particularly impressed by sinc ( not poly sinc) filter of Hq player. what is this sinc filter ?
 
     Share This Post       
post-12691979
Post #3,486 of 14,584

esimms86

100+ Head-Fier
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Messages
490
Reaction score
158
Joined
Oct 3, 2013
Posts
490
Likes
158
     Share This Post       
post-12692027
Post #3,487 of 14,584

rkt31

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Messages
1,536
Reaction score
443
Joined
Oct 14, 2014
Posts
1,536
Likes
443
thanks , I have read that post. good explanation by miss but still he does not elaborate much about sinc filter. he says that it is a special kind of filter which requires more computational power. nobody other too talks about this filter. everybody likes some variation of polysinc filters. I was mainly interested in pcm upsampling.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12692093
Post #3,490 of 14,584

Mython

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Messages
8,760
Reaction score
3,381
Joined
Feb 11, 2008
Posts
8,760
Likes
3,381

 
 
                                                                               

 
     Share This Post       
  • Like
Reactions: rgs9200m
post-12692249
Post #3,491 of 14,584

Beolab

Member of the Trade (Reseller)
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
1,273
Reaction score
194
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Posts
1,273
Likes
194
A while back I commented that I thought I could hear subtle differences between optical cables to DAVE, with a background that I previously could hear big differences between digital cables to Yggy.
So here's an update:

With Nagra CDC to DAVE, I tried 3 optical cables: AQ Diamond still on loan; the stock "freebie" that came with DAVE; and a newly received Mapleshade that others here have strongly recommended. Like I said, the differences were now rather subtle, but still there. Further complicated by the Mapleshade appearing to be directional, as the maker strongly claims.
In short I felt that Mapleshade and AQ were broadly on the same level, with the Mapleshade slightly more focused and precise, and the AQ more analogue-in-a-good-way.
However, as the AQ was over 4 times the price, it was a no brainer to return it, so I did.

Next tried the Mapleshade against the freebie cable.  The latter had a similar analoguey signature as the AQ, but was a step down in quality - i.e. a touch woollier, a touch more shut in, and a touch more grain in the upper mids. So the Mapleshade stays in place. Whether or not some of this is my imagination is rather a moot point for me now, because I'm done with cable changes and, with a microRendu on its way, I'm moving on to try computer/server sources. I repeat that these cable differences were more subtle than that I had experienced with the Yggy.

And also more subtle than what happended next when my washing machine pads arrived!!!. That deserves it's own post later this weekend :)   

I find my AQ Diamond more fluid / vivid / airy / wider with no grain in the upper mid/high against the Stock optical, BUT !!
There is extreme subtle, but it is hearable.

Then about the HQ Player filterning, i wounder whats happens with the siund when you choose Sinc filter and go direct to the DAVE ore through the MicroRendu then DAVE in combination with the Wats FIR Tap filter ??

Have anyone tried this? Is it a winner ?
 
     Share This Post       
post-12692286
Post #3,492 of 14,584

paulchiu

Sennheiser 666
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
1,794
Reaction score
319
Location
Manhattan
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Location
Manhattan
Posts
1,794
Likes
319
I find my AQ Diamond more fluid / vivid / airy / wider with no grain in the upper mid/high against the Stock optical.

Then about the HQ Player filterning, i wounder whats happens with the siund when you choose Sinc filter and go direct to the DAVE ore through the MicroRendu then DAVE in combination with the Wats FIR Tap filter ??

Have anyone tried this? Is it a winner ?
 
By HQ Player, are you talking about the software HQ Player usable with the microRendu?
If so, how does it sound with DAVE versus the Roon or another DLNA-player like JRiver Media Center?
 
Thanks
 
paul
 
     Share This Post       
post-12692289
Post #3,493 of 14,584

Christer

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
1,235
Reaction score
935
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Posts
1,235
Likes
935
  I believe the audiophile journey is made up of discoveries and even the brightest and most experienced among us are always still discovering and learning new things.  The day that Rob believes he has learned everything possible is the day that we should all start looking elsewhere for our next DAC.
 
 
This is unfortunate.  Hopefully, yours is still under warranty.
 
 
It sounds like you've already found a great DAC.  Congratulations.
 
If you can find a better solution, you should buy it.

Hello romaz,
I definitely agree with you regarding "the journey" in most ways, it is only the ever growing costs involved, that I have problems with.
I too suffer from "audiophilia nerviosa" to a sometimes embarrasing  degree.
And as I have clearly  stated, there is no doubt to me that DAVE is a superb DAC,maybe even  currently,THE best consumer DAC for PCM?
But  no 1: It is terribly expensive for me at least. No 2: It only does stereo and you cant´record with it.
And you are still expected to pay around 10k€
Looking at DAVE from that perspective, I am thinking of, and was already long before I auditioned DAVE, tempted to buy either a MERGING HORUS or HAPI, the two ADCs/DACs used by a growing number of  classical music labels where I have  actually been to sessions and heard things both live and played back raw.
I  know first-hand that mch/surround done right  sounds closer to the real thing than conventional stereo .
And  HORUS or at least,HAPI can be bought for roughly half the cost of one single stereo only and  playback  only DAVE.
And the problems with usb and jitter discussed here are moot. They don´t work with usb at all.
 
 
One thing real MCH can do clearly better and more realistically, than plain stereo, is soundstage and DEPTH.
But last week I downloaded the just released James  Matheson album from the label Yarlung in a newly developed format called SonoruS Holographic Imaging in its DXD form from nativeDSD.com.
And to my surprise and joy,played back via my two, only two, electrostatic speakers, it opened up the soundstage  and increased depth  and decreased masking effects in a way approaching what I have so far only heard from real mch.
I know Rob Watts is  really striving to bring better depth than the competition.
And if my memory serves me right DAVE excelled in that respect even via headphones.
I would of course like to hear if DAVE would unravel even more depth than my humble Benchmark DAC2 HGC does, but it was so good that I have played this album ten times in a week.
Unfortunately I can´t try it with HUGO. And equally unfortunately the warranty is out on it.
If instead of listening mainly to equipment tweaks, for a change you want both a great musical experience and a surprising HIFI experience provided your HIFI system is phase coherent through the whole chain,there are test tracks to try on Yarlung´s homesite and if they work as described for you download some great  contemporary, ACOUSTIC music from an enterprising label and download site.Sorry, but NO for headphones only  listeners, SonoruS does NOT work via headphones. But binaural does and  a  recent session I  missed was  actually recorded not only  in DSD 256/DXD stereo and mch , but also binaurallly,via MERGING HORUS, Mahler´s 7th.
Cheers Chris and enjoy the music via your DAVE.
 
     Share This Post       
post-12692413
Post #3,494 of 14,584

prot

1000+ Head-Fier
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
1,324
Reaction score
375
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Posts
1,324
Likes
375
On
A while back I commented that I thought I could hear subtle differences between optical cables to DAVE, with a background that I previously could hear big differences between digital cables to Yggy.
So here's an update:

With Nagra CDC to DAVE, I tried 3 optical cables: AQ Diamond still on loan; the stock "freebie" that came with DAVE; and a newly received Mapleshade that others here have strongly recommended. Like I said, the differences were now rather subtle, but still there. Further complicated by the Mapleshade appearing to be directional, as the maker strongly claims.
In short I felt that Mapleshade and AQ were broadly on the same level, with the Mapleshade slightly more focused and precise, and the AQ more analogue-in-a-good-way.
However, as the AQ was over 4 times the price, it was a no brainer to return it, so I did.

Next tried the Mapleshade against the freebie cable.  The latter had a similar analoguey signature as the AQ, but was a step down in quality - i.e. a touch woollier, a touch more shut in, and a touch more grain in the upper mids. So the Mapleshade stays in place. Whether or not some of this is my imagination is rather a moot point for me now, because I'm done with cable changes and, with a microRendu on its way, I'm moving on to try computer/server sources. I repeat that these cable differences were more subtle than that I had experienced with the Yggy.

And also more subtle than what happended next when my washing machine pads arrived!!!. That deserves it's own post later this weekend :)   

One thing is for sure: you do have a lot of imagination :)
 
     Share This Post       
post-12694834
Post #3,495 of 14,584

rudi0504

Headphoneus Supremus
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
449
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Posts
4,526
Likes
449
I have tried Chord Dave possibility pair with my portable source / Daps

Source :
Iphone 5 s
Sony ZX2
VentureCraft Valog SounDroid

dac Amp :
Chord Dave

Sound Quality :

the best SQ use Valog
Use: Optical
it can play 24 / 192KHz on Valog is the same on Chord Dave

the second Best Iphone 5 S
Use USB
wav 16 /44,1 KHz
surprisingly play in high rate 353,8 KHz

third Best Sony ZX2
Use USB
i play Native DSD
on Dave show only 176,8 KHz

Anyone can help me please

Why on iphone 5 s came out on Dave display
353,8 KHz ?
I use WAV 16bit /44,1KHz
I use Muisc Player Kaisertone
Via USB connection

On Sony ZX2
I play Native DSD
On Dave display only 176,8 KHz
Why Sony can not Play DSD via USB

I have tested use Iphone 6 s Rose Gold
The same music file WAV 16bit / 44,1 KHz
On Dave came out 44,1 KHz
I use Kaisertone

Thank you











 
     Share This Post       

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 5, Guests: 13)

Top