This whole post was well though out and balanced, as usual from romaz!
Regarding Round 2 of my DAVE/Yggy comparisons to BHSE/009, unfortunately life got in the way again, so I'll reserve judgement to another weekend, but in the meantime, here's where I'm currently at:
- A few weeks down the track, this demo DAVE is definitely sounding better than it did on the first occasion. I don't know how much of that time was spent being burned in.
- It has a very natural sound - a good thing for me. Any fears I had, that ultra transparency means ultra analytical, have vanished
- It's better than Yggy, but by how much I've yet to determine
- On both Yggy and DAVE, the Phase setting seems to matter quite a bit at this level. Subtle-but-significant. Nothing conclusive at this stage, more of a feeling. I wish this wasn't the case, as it's another check to add to The Ritual. On the plus side, it takes me just seconds to decide which phase is best per CD, which out of a small sample is usually is the negative setting.
More interesting maybe is that I couldn't resist a quick Round 3, comparing HD800S into DAVE vs BHSE/009 fed by DAVE. Much too soon to be conclusive, but the HD800 gave an really good account of itself. Not necessarily better, but at least entering the same ballpark, albeit with a different sound signature. Which means that a complete change of direction and downsizing still deserves further exploration. I'm not averse to a bit of Ritual for my hifi (coming from a vinyl background), but looking at the tiny DAVE (driven by maybe a handheld portable player) against a complete stack of big boxes - well it makes you think....
One thing that surprised me though was that the HD800's sound stage was noticeably smaller than that on the 009's, especially on width. From many reports, I thought that the HD800 was meant to be the king of big sound stage?