Saw this
post from JDS Labs this morning, which reminded me that a simple lossless/hi-res streaming set-up can be implemented simply and cheaply at home using a $35 Chromecast Audio with an optical-enabled DAC...like Mojo. Sample-rate is capped @ 24/96, (and of course no DSD) which is more than enough for most people and certainly respectable for a $35 streamer.
I've posted about CCA + the Mojo previously, but it got me thinking about if I had my time again, would I have gone with Poly? Obviously not a
ceteris paribus comparison due to the $999 sunk costs into the Poly, but one can still make a fairly-reasoned comparison.
Had I known back pre October launch when I ordered it that a control-app for Android would not be ready in May 2018 (with no sign/word of one in sight) would I have ordered one? In all honesty, "now me" would have advised "then me" to do the following:
1. Home use: grab a $35 Chromecast audio for home streaming to Mojo. Native Tidal / Google Play Music implementation, and the ability to stream lossless from my Android's FLAC collection via DLNA. Bonus party trick: voice-command playback for GPM via my Google Home Mini.
2. On-the-go-use: grab a $99 Shanling M0 DAP. A tiny (38g, 45mm x 40mm x 13.5 mm) touch-screen DAP with proper UI that's expandable with up to 512GB of micro-SD space. It has its own ESS ES9218p DAC for native playback (does a respectable but non Mojo-threatening 80mw @ 32 ohms), but has USB-c out so can be a transport for another DAC...like Mojo. Aptx-HD bluetooth as well. I can just picture it: An M0 attached to Mojo's roof using a 3M Command-strip; with a USB-c --> USB-micro connector. This would give Mojo it's own 'interface' for playback, without the need to rely on wifi/hotspot, plus the well-known perils we've all experienced with skipping, cut-out, gaps in playback etc.
Anyhow, just musing about how one could go about doing things. Poly+Mojo's certainly a talented, mercurial combination that's ambitiously over-engineered from a concept perspective, but sometimes there's simpler and cheaper ways to go about doing things. Reminds me of that well-known story about NASA's substantial investment in inventing a pen that would work in orbit, as they couldn't get ink to reliably flow in zero-G. Time, brains, and dollars were thrown away on this project, while meanwhile the Soviets...used pencils.
Happy listening all.