What exactly do you mean by that? If the sound image is closer through Hyper and P+, I have the strong impression that I am missing sound information. But otherwise yes, it's sharper.One point to consider about the point source.
When you go from top to bottom the sound image is closer to the point source at the top due to clean edge definition.
While when go down, the image is more expanded and far from the point source. The image can expand more in space but the edge definition is inferior. That could cause bigger, deeper sound stage in some case but the image precision is worse.
The sound signature can varied with device when combining with its circuit but I‘m glad that you can understand what I have written about the filter in different machine. Yep, The filter is Matter.
Great, I'm glad to see that I'm really not crazy when I think something like this.I have similar sharing with my personal friends in this hobby but to a slightly different extent. I suggested "repeatedly" that they should stop using Hyper mode exclusively. I understand Hyper offers the biggest "difference" from their previous DAPs, but the reason why we offered many different combinations of settings/modes is because Cayin didn't believe Hyper is always THE choice for every IEM or scenario.
Stop using Hyper Mode and use Hyper Mode exclusively are like two ends of a pendulum clock. Be water and let the N30LE blend into your music, know the performance and sonic characteristics of your DAP, and pick the combination with an open mind.
Very informative, thank you!The digital filters in AKM chipset have always been a very interesting topic, I believe the Engineers who developed these anti-aliasing filters have nothing to do with the naming of the filters, quite often the explanation from R&D engineers are far too difficult to understand, and communicate in layman terms, so Sales and Marketing team has to develop names and illustration to term the hard science into selling points. So if you make any sense between what you read from the name of the filters to what you heard with your ears, don't be surprised, we have all gone through that stage at some point.
We used to have a lot of discussions on the AKM filters with the "older" DAPs when the DAPs were relatively simple and we didn't have extensive features such as Class A/AB, P/P+, tube/SS, .... , so filters were important features to shape the audio signature of your DAP. For those who want to understand the concept behind the digital filters of the AKM chipset, @docholliday has compared the filters using digital audio reference signals and measured the filters in the studio where he works. He offered the best explanation I have come across. Yes, that was 2017 and the N3 was a $150 DAP based on AK4490. The discussion from Post #3,492 to Post #3,516 and Post #3,623 to Post #3,628 is a good starting point. AKM probably has changed some of the filter settings for different DAC chipsets, but the concepts remain the same IMHO.