voteforpedro
Head-Fier
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2013
- Posts
- 91
- Likes
- 11
Has anybody looked into getting custom molds made for these IEMs? I just cannot get a good, solid fit with either of the supplied white or blue ear tips.
Now while I am liking these babies more and more, I can't help myself wondering about some, um, confusing marketing on the part of Cardas,
1. I know Cardas is all about the golden ratio blah blah blah but............what's so good about the golden ratio in designing a tiny pair of earphones?
2. Yes I've read about the ear mirror bit, how the EMs mimic the auditory system blah blah blah..............but again, what's so good about mimicking the auditory system in designing a tiny pair of earphones?
3. Very well, Cardas followed the trend and show us proudly a blown up diagram of the inside workings of the EMs...........with absolutely NOTHING to see. Just plain good-old-fashioned dynamic earphones like millions others that were thrown into the market in the past 10 years. So..........am I missing something, or the diagram is MEANT to be showing NOTHING?
Unlike many others (or like many out there as well), I do appreciate manufacturers letting us know the concept behind their designs and technology applied into their products. That'd be great. BUT the missing link in the Cardas case is: why this concept? how is the concept related to the sound intended by Cardas? Don't give me the shXt that the golden ratio exist in the nature blah blah blah............that makes no sense.
Glad to see I'm not the only being puzzled by this thread and by the Cardas IEMs since they were annouced more than 2 years ago.
There is absolutely no proof of science nor the beginning of an explanation behind these IEMs. The concha thing is just... unexplainable...
Although there's a lot of marketing bullsh*t with most manufacturers when it comes to headphones, it's always better than nothing, especially when you're asked for a hefty price.
And to make it more cryptic, reviews by Headfi-ers in this thread are pretty ambiguous: these IEMs do not have awesome ergonomics so far, sound has no "amazing" clarity or any obvious quality that makes them stand apart from the crowd of dynamic driver IEMs.
And still people claim "they like them more and more" for some unknown reason like "they sound just right".
Although it may look like I'm bashing, I'm actually just wondering: what exactly make people like these IEMs ? Anything precise / concrete that can appeal to others ?
Because so far it's not really exciting.
Originally Posted by fzman
When i listen to music thru the 5813s I note that tracks take less time to play - listening to the first track from a folder almost always turns into a listening session of the whole folder, and then more folders. I tap my foot more, boogie down, air guitar, whatever more with these than any others. I smile more when i am using them, and i do not pick up my Nook or smart phone to "read" while i am listening to them. They give me more insight into the tonality of the instruments being played on the recording, and the talent of the musicians.