beaniebaesha
100+ Head-Fier
so folks as the campfire solaris is becoming a headfi hit how does it compare to empire ears legend x, and other iems such as the rha cl2 which is also become pretty popular recently
I just received my c5v sounds great with solaris but are you getting any hiss from this combo? I might need to get an ifi iematch maybe that will calm down the hiss.Do you like it?
Yeah well that 399$ deal was kind of hard to resist
Well worth it to get other tubes, I am waiting for a 6BF7 (out of stock at ALO) that I will then send to ALO to be mounted to PCB. Others have mentioned 6021 but since it seems to be a dual triodes variant of 6111 not sure I'll get it. Many swear by 6111 and don't like 6832 so YMMV. My gripe with the 6111 is the same as it is with the Oriolus BA300S, clean reference but not a rich tubey sound to my ears...
Tube rolling is easy too so I encourage to get other tubes
Right now 1Z / CV5 with 6832 / Solaris is the best listening experience I have ever had, really great!
I just received my CV5 sounds great with solaris but are you getting any hiss from this combo? I might need to get an ifi iematch maybe that will calm down the hiss
I just received my c5v sounds great with solaris but are you getting any hiss from this combo? I might need to get an ifi iematch maybe that will calm down the hiss.
Yeah I do get some hiss, it varies upon sources though, WM1Z has much less hiss than the DX120 so basically amping just amplifies the source.
Solaris is sensitive to hiss but it's still quite manageable, YMMV depending on how loud you listen to.
You gain so much dynamics with the headroom that I am willing to take in some hiss
Just spent the evening comparing the Campfire Audio Solaris to the 64 Audio U12t.
Before I say anything, I consider the U12t to be the best IEM in 64's current lineup. It has a better Frequency Response Balance than the Tia Forte and it provides a sense of texture and musicality the U18 just can't compete with. U18 and Tia Forte might have better technicalities and resolution(not by much tho), U12t is just the more coherent and complete package. I was in talks with 64 Audio for a custom A12t before the Solaris was announced and I took a gamble when they launched.
64 Audio U12t is good. It's very good but I consider the Solaris to be clearly a step better than U12t. However, it's close, very close. If the Campfire Audio hadn't release the Solaris, I would even have a A12t. I like the U12t, quite a lot.
Let's start with the bass. U12t has a little more bass quantity. Solaris bass extends deeper, much deeper. Bass timbres are totally different. U12t's bass driver does texture incredibly well for a BA driver. I would even say, this one of the top BA bass I have heard. Solaris timbre is totally different because of the dynamic driver. It has that sub-woofer like quality that no BA can ever match and the you get layers upon layers of well textured bass. You can't really beat that with a BA bass setup. It's just totally different playing fields. If are a fan of articulate BA bass, then U12t has one of the best BA bass out there but Solaris just renders the bass more naturally.
Midrange is where the Solaris is significantly better than the U12t. I think with their recent releases, 64 is having a tough time tuning the midrange for a lot of their IEMs for some reason. U12t midrange struck me as somewhat tonally uneven at least compared to Solaris. There was a recession in the lower mids but then it suddenly goes loud and then a slight recession again in female vocals. It's just not very coherent. It's still a great midrange though and I actually prefer the U12t midrange compared to other IEMs like Vega, Andromeda, Tia Forte and U18. Solaris mids sound more coherent by comparison. U12t mids had more body though, Solaris sounds a little lean by comparison. There's quite a bit of sibilance with the U12t and none with the Solaris.
Treble is a toss up. Treble is done well on the U12t. It's both faster and has more weight than the Solaris but not by much. Solaris is actually right up in Speed and Weight but U12t just edges it at both. Solaris is a little more extended though. There was no harshness on both and both are more or less equally transparent. Treble is well done on both actually.
Solaris is quite a bit better at separation and imaging than U12t. Soundstage is more or less equal. U12t might be a touch wider and Solaris a touch deeper.
I have big ears so U12t was actually a little small for me. Solaris sits flush in my ears.Nice comparison. Do you experience any fit issues or "not good enough" sound isolation with Solaris? I consider u12t to be already "big kind of IEMs" and Solaris looks even bigger and I'd expect they're also significantly heavier, due to its housing material. I've read few post about Solaris fit experiences, but I'd be interested in comparison against u12t, because I've had a chance to listen to them for a few hours. Thanks
One for the Blues / soul fans out there ( @davidmolliere ?) - listening to the album "The Door" by Keb' Mo using Cayin N5iiS in balanced (CA superlitz via OKCSC pigtail adapter) and the bass tones and guitar are just melting in my ears
Do people wear the Solaris with the cable over the ears or with cable straight down?
Do people wear the Solaris with the cable over the ears or with cable straight down?
so folks as the campfire solaris is becoming a headfi hit how does it compare to empire ears legend x, and other iems such as the rha cl2 which is also become pretty popular recently
Do people wear the Solaris with the cable over the ears or with cable straight down?
How could anyone wear them straight down? I don't see how it would fit, not designed that way... maybe I lack imagination
listening to the album "The Door" by Keb' Mo