I'm using an EH6922 in my Aune T1, like a lot of people are. My Bravo V3 (to be used as an output stage when it arrives) also has the same tube. Should I roll both to the Amperex? Much perceivable difference?
The
Electro Harmonix 6922 tubes are new issue, made in Russia tubes. I have not personally listened to that particular tube.
I have listened to the Chinese Shu Guang 12AU7 tubes that come stock in the Bravo V2. I have auditioned the
JJ Electronics 12AU7 (brand new, bought it from Amazon), as well as a new issue
Electro Harmonix 12AU7 (came with a batch of much better tubes in a lot from ebay). Frankly, they all suck. I consider those purchases a waste of money. I keep all those tubes in a cup labeled "Crappy Tubes". Because I spent good money on them, I haven't quite been able to bring myself to throw them away. Someday I may put them up for auction on ebay. Maybe someone else will need convincing, and be willing to give me a few bucks for them, LOL.
Many others besides myself, have stated that the brand new Chinese and Russian tubes simply are horrible, compared to any of the old* (1970's and prior) tubes (the older, the better). The Amperex tubes are very nice, but as anyone who's done any tube rolling will tell you, I can't guarantee what sounds good to you. There are simply too many variables. For example, would you be referring to the Amperex made in Holland, or the Amperex Mullards made in Britain? Amperex Bugle Boy tubes are bright, clean tubes, that probably sound best with cans and gear that are naturally dark, and need some uplifting.
The combination of your headphones, your DAC, your amp, and your ears, is unique. What I find good sounding may not be what you like. All I can tell you for sure is, the old vintage tubes will always sound better. Whether you should use an Amperex, a Telefunken, a Mullard, a Raytheon black plate, an RCA clear top, is a matter of opinion. But they'll all sound better than the newly made EH junk.
-------
*Note: the term NOS (new old stock) is overloaded, and frequently used improperly. Most sellers label anything old as NOS, because it brings more money to claim that some 40-50 year old tube has never been used, sitting in a box for years. I suppose a few of them are, but most are not. The more honest sellers will state that they "test NOS", which means that the tube was tested and exhibits readings equivalent to a new tube on a given tester. Regardless of what a seller labels a tube, you want to buy something that's been tested, and tests in the "good" range, preferably with "balanced sides" (meaning in the case of a 12AU7 that both triodes test equally good - or close to it).
On the other hand, bargains can be found with tubes that have not been tested, tubes that test below the "good" range, or tubes that do not have balanced sides. Be careful. There are a few good deals, but a lot more that aren't.
Over this last summer and fall, I have become something of an oddball tube collector. Well ok, I was already an oddball. So I guess I'm becoming a tube collector. I surely don't need this plethora of preamp tubes I'm accumulating. I just like comparing the sound that different tubes produce, with different music. My musical taste is pretty broad (or at least I like to think so), and as it turns out, there are tubes better suited to certain types of music than others. So much so, that one could probably create a catalog of ideal tubes to use for different recordings or genres.
And I'm doing all this with a Bravo V2.
I went to build a shopping list for modifying my V2 the other night, and much to my dismay have discovered that Mouser is out of IRL510's. I'm wary of buying some from ebay, but unless I want to wait until February, I'm out of luck. I am really, really wanting to mod one of my V2's to see what it sounds like. I may have to wait. So if I don't have to work overtime over the holidays, I may finally buy a Bottlehead Crack and have some fun building my own amp. At which point I'll have to start the whole tube buying exercise with power tubes. Yowza.