Brand Spanking New A&K AK120II and AK100II
May 27, 2014 at 5:18 AM Post #316 of 6,668
They got to remember who is their targeted consumer next time. No offense. 
ph34r.gif

 
May 27, 2014 at 5:35 AM Post #317 of 6,668
May 27, 2014 at 10:23 AM Post #319 of 6,668
why would i spend 2200 for ak120II if the flagship is 2400 for Ak240
 
AK really are very expensive gear 
 
May 27, 2014 at 11:34 AM Post #324 of 6,668
so who determines the price, how much do u think they will cost after few months
 
May 27, 2014 at 11:41 AM Post #325 of 6,668

I'd like to see objective measurements of these bargains...I'm 99% sure that quality will not justify the cheap price.
 
This company will end up selling 7 daps a year priced 100.000$.
 
End of rant
 
May 27, 2014 at 12:12 PM Post #327 of 6,668
i don't believe that producing such daps is that expensive, and they would benefit a lot more if they would make available within a reazanble price, small profit per piece but big sales 
 
May 27, 2014 at 12:18 PM Post #328 of 6,668
Costs a lot more to develop and build an AK100II than say a Shure 846 yet they are the same price.  Just saying.
 
May 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM Post #329 of 6,668
  Costs a lot more to develop and build an AK100II than say a Shure 846 yet they are the same price.  Just saying.


Which raises a question I've always wondered about.  Would one experience better sound with a $1000 earphone and a $500 portable integrated dac/player or a $500 earphone and a $1000 portable integrated dac/player?? Inquiring minds want to know.
 
May 27, 2014 at 1:37 PM Post #330 of 6,668
As always... it depends.  I personally view it that while the transducer makes the most difference tonally, it can't correct for what is lost along the way.  Being highly resolving and fed garbage is a great way to ruin the listening experience.  Flipped the other way a great signal fed into a poor transducer that you do enjoy tonally is, well, enjoyable.  Balance is key.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top