Modified my passive A/B switch to include 3.5mm socket.
Methodology: same track is played on Z2 and M2s which acts as a transport for Mojo, volumes carefully matched. I usually delay second device by few bars, so I can capture mental "snapshot" (impression) of the certain qualities of sound and have same section replayed from the second device straight away after I push A/B switch (this works better for me compared to perfectly in-sync playback).
Preliminary observations:
Z2 (Burson V6 vivid opamp, Dip8 AD275, Nichicon BP caps) + F1 actually is not too bad at all, when compared to Mojo!
In terms of the frequency response they are practically identical, the difference is in presentation and soundstage: Mojo has more aggressive (convincing?) mids, while Z2's mids are softer and more relaxed; mojo has better definition and precision in highs (unsurprisingly), while Z2 is again on a softer side (velvety should I say?). Mojo's sounstage is... Things are strange here. Z2's presentation is wider, especially in mids (V6's contribution no doubt), while mojo is more 3D sounding, especially if there's plenty of reverberation present in the music. Obviously Mojo's ability to resolve low-level detail contributes to it significantly.
Both setups have their own sound signature and one is not necessarily significantly better than another, while mojo wins in terms of precision and analytical yet warm presentation, I find Z2+F1 highly musical and relaxed.
Overall conclusion: no clear winner, unless you look at the price tag...
TBC