kraken2109
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2013
- Posts
- 716
- Likes
- 67
hmm what should i said the LF and HF db on? any ideas? dont know much about this.
They're for room adjustment
hmm what should i said the LF and HF db on? any ideas? dont know much about this.
can you explain?
Your room affects the frequency response of the speakers.
Unfortunately, unless you have measuring equipment to find out the frequency response of your speakers at the listening position, you can't really correct for that. So best thing to do is to use those adjustments to suit your personal listening tastes.
I'd like to explain the definition between active and passive systems in some detail because it is clear that not everyone posting in this thread understands the difference.
It has nothing to do with the location of the amplifiers. It is dependent on the type of crossover used. The part that divides up the input signal so that the high notes go to the little speakers and the low notes go to the big speakers.
In an active system the crossover comes before the amplifiers. Each size speaker has a separate amplifier. In a passive system there is an amplifier and the crossover then divides up the frequencies. A powered system is exactly the same as a passive system except the amplifier is stuffed into one of the boxes.
It should be clear that an active system presents many potential advantages, except maybe cost! In fact both pro and domestic manufacturers have always understood this. High end expensive (and powerful) systems have almost always been active for over 3 decades. Genelec didn't invent actives. They were just the first to realise that if they miniaturised everything they could fit it all into one box. (digital switching amps made this practical) Hence the quality of actives with added convenience and some cost saving. Really big and powerful high end systems are almost always active. It's just that the amplifiers and crossover units are not necessarily co-located in the same enclosure.
Apologies for the pedantry but it's important we all understand the terms we are using. Carry on...
The fact that he claims B&W is neutral is suspect in itself as B&W is the Poster Child for "British Sound" and tipped up bass and treble, in fact a cursory glance through Stereophile and Soundstage measurements shows this to be empirically true.
Also the reason why individuals might find one speaker fatiguing vary due to individual differences in hearing, and age. Younger people are more likely to cite higher frequency cone breakup modes as hearing fatigue due a wider hearing spectrum, older people are more likely to cite a tipped up midrange.
Hey guys, quick question....
I have the emotiva mini-x for my he-500, but now i want a pair of bookshelf speakers.
ARX and Ascend Acoustics are as well known in home audio for their speakers as Emotiva is for their electronics. Check out the Arx A1b and Ascend CBM-170 SE. Either will work quite well for nearfield usage.
It would be best to experience the Klipsch RB series before going with them. Many people find them fatiguing for HT usage, much less in a nearfield situation.
I've seen the CBM recommended so often, are they that good? Also the Arx planar tweeter...that's caught my attention! How well are the JBL compared to these kinds of speakers, they've gotten some crazy reviews...Also, of those two you recommended, what's the main pros/cons between their differences?
You can look through these two threads over at AVS:
http://www.avsforum.com/t/629769/ascend-se-owners-thread
http://www.avsforum.com/t/1429229/the-official-arx-owners-thread-a1-a1b-a2-a2b-a3-a5-etc
They are both fairly neutral speakers that are repeatedly found to be more similar than different. I think the differences between them will come down to personal listening tastes and your room acoustics/placement more than anything you could determine by reading on the Internet. It would be like trying to decide between two different apples that come equally recommended when you've never tasted an apple before. The primary differences that do seem to stand out are that the A1bs tend to extend just a little deeper, but the Ascends have a little better sensitivity. As for the tweeters, know that the Ascend tweeter is a better model of Seas tweeter than is used in the NHT Classic Threes (Seas tweeters are well recognized in home audio circles). So don't get too caught up in the planar magnetic tweeter hype; both have equal quality tweeters and implementation.
I haven't demoed the JBL's yet. But I haven't heard any other powered monitors in the <$600 range that stand out as definitively better than those two.
Sensitivity is unimportant to me as long as they can get decently loud with the Mini-x, and I'm pretty sure the A1b would be able to, right? I'd probably choose the A1b as it sounds a lot like the he-500 vs he-6 debate, warmer more intimate sound vs more detailed and analytical sound. I'm more toward enjoying relaxed music without too much treble and the A1b seems to have GREAT reviews as well. Thank you so much for the recommendations. It'll probably be a long time till I decide and actually buy a pair of speakers, but these will probably remain at the top of my list.
Uuummmmm........Sensitivity is extremely important to you. It will determine the dB output of the speaker when combined with the amp.