You mean the band with Neil Diamond as the song writer/guitarist, session musicians playing bass, electric guitars, drums and organ with The Monkeys singing along?
Not sure they had any cables at all, the real cables were in the studio where the real musicians were recording?
Milli Vanillli was also apparently quite ādreamyā and another great āreal bandā.
Mike had a secret life in Tijuana that they didn't talk about on the showDoes that mean you're Greg, Pete, or Bobby? I don't remember that Mike had a son named Joaquin
Mike had a secret life in Tijuana that they didn't talk about on the show
Sure and there are numerous other examples such as Beethoven, Ives, Stravinsky and countless others, even arguably Bach.
BTW, they are both just DAC chips. They do not have neural networks or AI and are therefore incapable of being either clinical or musical. The only thing theyāre capable of being is accurate/inaccurate and both are accurate beyond the thresholds of audibility, as indeed all 16bit or greater audio DAC chips have been for 3 decades or so.
Neil did only write a few songs (but not only the lyrics) and he did also play on some of them, thatās the point. Other songs were written by other song writers and were played by different musicians. The Monkees wasnāt really a band, it was just various different session musicians and writers/composers whose recordings were marketed as The Monkees but typically only included some of the supposed members and occasionally none at all.
Clearly that is FALSE! The fundamental principle of aesthetic judgement refers to the sensory contemplation or appreciation of something and artistic judgement refers to the recognition, appreciation or criticism of art or an art work. The āfundamental principles of aestheticsā is NOT whether bigshot is able to contemplate or appreciate it. You are judging by your personal preferences and NOT by the fundamental principles of aesthetics!
Firstly, you can ālook forā and āadmireā whatever you choose but obviously that does not define either the fundamental principles of aesthetics nor what is art/music.
That is exactly why what youāre saying is false! Neither the fundamental principles of aesthetics nor of music is defined by whether or someone can hum it or not. And, you are contradicting yourself, you said you liked Ives but unless youāve somehow taught yourself to hum tone clusters and different tunes simultaneously then you canāt hum Ives.
I did try to hum birdsong, leaves rustling and audience noise but I couldnāt do any of them well and I certainly couldnāt do all of them at the same time. But then I canāt hum most of Bachās Cello Suites, the Rites of Spring, Beethovenās Moonlight Sonata and countless other great works. So therefore none of them are music or fulfil the fundamental principles of aesthetics? Itās nonsense bigshot!
Iāve already told you Iāve tried to hum it myself, as I have Bach Cello Suites and many others (and failed) but this is a ridiculously fallacious argument even by your standards! Are you seriously suggesting that my ability to hum some piece of music defines what is and is not music?
Youāre loosing it bigshot, all the ridiculous audiophile nonsense you spend your time fighting here, yet here you are not only with just as a ridiculous argument but stamping your your little feet demanding I fulfil your ludicrous instructions.
