Gojira
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- May 28, 2003
- Posts
- 358
- Likes
- 21
After Duncan's recent post on ebay usernames for head-fiers, apparently as a result of our recent "bidding war", I thought it might be useful if we had some discussion about the ethics of bidding against other head-fiers. These are some of my thoughts on the subject.
Who else are we going to bid against for the vintage PCDPs? Non head-fiers have no reason to suspect these players are anything special. Does it seem more fair that whoever bids first should win? I'm sure the seller wouldn't agree, and I'm not sure I do either. Especially since sniping often makes sense (in this case it would have saved Duncan like 50 Euros or so), and the first person to bid is not necessarily the first person to notice the item. If the seller is also a head-fier it becomes even more of a thorny issue. I'm still not sure what I think about it. I mean, if I knew Duncan in real life and he were a friend would I still have bid against him? Probably not, but if we both felt the same way, neither of us would end up bidding on it.
If it had been *any* item other than an unusually cheap D-515 (my current favorite discman), I would have stepped aside. I have intentionally not bid on items in the past when I saw that he was already bidding, not so much because he was a head-fier as such, but out of gratitude for his great PCDP reviews.
To me, the fairest outcome is for whoever wants the item the most to get it. But how do you determine this without raising the price? Price is the usual way (especially on Ebay) of determining who wants an item the most.
Having said all this, I kind of regret bidding against Duncan because all I succeeded in doing was raising his price (which is precisely what I feared was going to happen). So, although I lean toward price being the final arbiter of fairness, I'm not sure what to think about this issue. I do believe we all have to decide ethical issues for ourselves, but I'm curious about what other head-fiers think.
Who else are we going to bid against for the vintage PCDPs? Non head-fiers have no reason to suspect these players are anything special. Does it seem more fair that whoever bids first should win? I'm sure the seller wouldn't agree, and I'm not sure I do either. Especially since sniping often makes sense (in this case it would have saved Duncan like 50 Euros or so), and the first person to bid is not necessarily the first person to notice the item. If the seller is also a head-fier it becomes even more of a thorny issue. I'm still not sure what I think about it. I mean, if I knew Duncan in real life and he were a friend would I still have bid against him? Probably not, but if we both felt the same way, neither of us would end up bidding on it.
If it had been *any* item other than an unusually cheap D-515 (my current favorite discman), I would have stepped aside. I have intentionally not bid on items in the past when I saw that he was already bidding, not so much because he was a head-fier as such, but out of gratitude for his great PCDP reviews.
To me, the fairest outcome is for whoever wants the item the most to get it. But how do you determine this without raising the price? Price is the usual way (especially on Ebay) of determining who wants an item the most.
Having said all this, I kind of regret bidding against Duncan because all I succeeded in doing was raising his price (which is precisely what I feared was going to happen). So, although I lean toward price being the final arbiter of fairness, I'm not sure what to think about this issue. I do believe we all have to decide ethical issues for ourselves, but I'm curious about what other head-fiers think.