headwhacker
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2013
- Posts
- 4,763
- Likes
- 770
DAC3 also have an amplifier. Which measures flat as well.
Sorry for asking a question on an old post of yours. But, I wonder how's DAC3 HGC vs Violectric DACs (V800 or V850?) to your ears? Also, what was the best DAC to your ears for pure DAC duty only? Thanks!!I also reviewed Hugo 2 and Benchmark DAC3 HGC. Along with Lake People (Violectric) Reference Series DAC & amp, ADI-2 Pro and DAC, Hugo 1 & TT.
Obviously Benchmark has the advantage of the many connections. The DAC is great but as a head-amp I would prefer any of the others. It is very difficult to control the volume precisely. If you use some heavy headphones, that's ok. It provides plenty of power for insane volume, but the two headphone outs are not versatile nor graceful.
Personally, I went with the Hugo 2 for portability and the ADI-2 Pro as desktop solution. I don't think I will upgrade either for a few years. I don't have any super-difficult-to-drive headphones like the Abyss, so these two performed best for my needs.
What exactly do you mean by "DAC duty only"?Sorry for asking a question on an old post of yours. But, I wonder how's DAC3 HGC vs Violectric DACs (V800 or V850?) to your ears? Also, what was the best DAC to your ears for pure DAC duty only? Thanks!!
I will be using the preamp out to my headamp Violectric V281. So, headphone out on DAC won’t matter much for me. I read Violectirc V850 has somewhat similar tonal balance to Benchmark DACs. Violectic V850 will stack better on the top of my V281 and is a bit cheaper, but I’m reading Dac3 HGC may be viewed as more of a technical unit. I wonder if either DACs do something better compared each other from the people who has first hand experience. But, it was hard to find a person who heard both Violectric and Benchmark DAC. Anything you recall on their sound signatures such as details, timbre or soundstage?What exactly do you mean by "DAC duty only"?
A) If you are talking about whatever happens before analog amplification, my answer is very simple. None of the devices will ever create audible flaws for a consumer as long as he has human hearing. I'm not saying you cannot hear large amounts of jitter, high THD, strong crosstalk, wrong phase, etc., but when you're asking about RME, Chord, Benchmark, Lake People/ Violectric, etc. it really shouldn't make a difference - unlike some mobile DACs (tablet, smartphone, laptop).
B) If you want to include the analog output, what you most likely will hear is a synergy with the headphones you are using. Of course, this is also part of the DAC. But it will depend on your audio chain. Do you plan to use the DAC as a pre-amp for speakers or use the headphone out
Not from memory. But I can quote from my reviews:But, it was hard to find a person who heard both Violectric and Benchmark DAC. Anything you recall on their sound signatures such as details, timbre or soundstage?
As a whole, the Benchmark DAC3 HGC might impress more consumers that are looking for a good companion in the living room. The abundance of in- and outputs make it easier to implement it in a speaker setup, as well as the convenience of a remote. It cannot match the superior headphone amplification, though, whereas the DAC unit sonically performs on a similar level.
Do keep in mind that I had the Lake People Reference Series at home (which is basically but not exactly the Violectric units.) After having the DAC3, the Lake People RS and the RME ADI-2 Pro at home at the same time (and Hugo 2), I bought myself the RME ADI-2 Pro because I think it easily provides the best value of all the devices. It's a Pro device, though, so be sure to read the lengthy manual and do a lot of online research on how to tweak and improve your system. The cheaper ADI-2 DAC is even more recommendable, IMO.Sonically, the Lake People Reference Series comes very close [to the Benchmark DAC3 HGC]. The RS06 DAC sounds alike in many ways, but adding a dedicated head-amp to the RS 06 set closes the price gap significantly. Yet you’d still lack the comfort of a remote and a multitude of connections. The Lake People does not even allow two optical inputs at the same time.
Pulling my writer’s choice 2016 RME’s ADI-2 Pro into the mix, also with a dual 6.3mm head-amp, I must say there are two completely different motivations behind the products. The Benchmark DAC3 is a device that simply works – a wonderful plug ‘n’ play DAC. The RME, however, might bother the user with firmware upgrades, different DA filters, dual EQ settings, different settings for different outputs, etc. And then it doesn’t even have regular RCA connections.
Sonically, the RME is somewhat of a chameleon but never loses a more musical touch thanks to the AKM chips. The DAC3 will always sound more transparent, though. This should be an easy pick. Either you are looking for a desktop solution for monitoring and tweaking, or you need a carefree package that will be the heart of your stereo system for a long time.
Had a bad unit. Replacement one sounds pristine and transparent. This dac does not sound harsh like most ESS implementations I've heard. A++ Benchmark!Picked one up... does it need major burn-in? Cause it sounds very shrill and tissy for me on day 1. Ive has Sabre days before and didn’t sound this light. Also the bass has no extension. If this doesn’t change, gonna have to return it.
Thanks for the detailed feedbakcs! I did not know you had published those reviews. Non pro version of RME ADI-2 happen to be on my radar too along with Chord Cutest.Not from memory. But I can quote from my reviews:
Do keep in mind that I had the Lake People Reference Series at home (which is basically but not exactly the Violectric units.) After having the DAC3, the Lake People RS and the RME ADI-2 Pro at home at the same time (and Hugo 2), I bought myself the RME ADI-2 Pro because I think it easily provides the best value of all the devices. It's a Pro device, though, so be sure to read the lengthy manual and do a lot of online research on how to tweak and improve your system. The cheaper ADI-2 DAC is even more recommendable, IMO.
I once owned the DAC2. I'd say wait till a DAC4 comes out. Just my opinion.Hi fellas, question for you. I've had the dac2 for a few years now and I'm toying with the idea of getting a dac3. I have a bryston 4bsst2 and Golden reference triton 1 speakers. I can sell the dac2 on canuck audio mart for around $1100 so I'm looking at 2k CAD out of pocket to upgrade. Is the difference negligible or is it worth the cost? Or is there any other dac preamp in this price that you all would recommend instead? Your input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
The DAC2 is more than capable. Even with DAC3 around. If you dont have a desktop DAC/headphone amp yet going for DAC3 make sense. But if you have DAC2 already, I don’t think it make sense to upgrade to DAC3.I once owned the DAC2. I'd say wait till a DAC4 comes out. Just my opinion.