MohawkUS
1000+ Head-Fier
"Strom-Amps" sounds almost simplistic, like "current driven amplfication". Doesn't necessarily imply opamp chips, like trans-impedance or the sort. Not sure I have anything against an opamp chip gain stage, per se, but it seems to me that their main advantage is in small size for portable amp products and such, with their down side in circuit inflexibility for signal control and/or conditioning, as opposed to discrete components which can be varied and positioned to optimize that particular signal gain circuitry.
Of course you can have a combination of onboard (chip) and off board circuits, but I would think a product of this caliber would be comprised of mostly discrete components,especially in the gain stage, and except for perhaps some auxiliary function chip modules doing straight-forward signal processing or conversion and the like. The flip side of that is that you can bring a whole lot of transistors to bear using chip technology, like a bank of opamps for amplification control.
It's gratifying that they're duly impressed with the HPA-21, tho.
Pros & Cons. I would say op-amps can be machined more accurately eliminating the need to match components as is done with discrete designs. I would assume this would result in less money being spent on labor/throw away components and more on other parts of design. Graham Slee has written some interesting posts on why he uses op-amps in his designs and how a number of manufacturers just copy op-amp schematics using discrete components.
Based on my limited knowledge I would say that the ideal solution is probably op-amps made in house, built to the specifications of the product being designed(rather than the inverse situation with off the shelf chips.)