Ok, so why the hell is this amp softer with an XLR input? I'm using an LCD-X with a single-ended cable and have tried both inputs, changing the cables between the DAC and amp of course. There's a clear difference in how the bass hits. Would a balanced cable change that or are the reviewers right? What in the world is this about?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
AURALiC owners unite!
Noldir
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Posts
- 239
- Likes
- 47
Ok, so why the hell is this amp softer with an XLR input? I'm using an LCD-X with a single-ended cable and have tried both inputs, changing the cables between the DAC and amp of course. There's a clear difference in how the bass hits. Would a balanced cable change that or are the reviewers right? What in the world is this about?
Ehr, it should be louder (and from memory, mine is). Just because the way XLR balanced audio works. Whats your source?
Or are you talking about how the music is rendered differently between balanced and unbalanced mode? That one is easier: in balanced mode you have higher voltage swings but lower current available. In unbalanced mode it's the other way around (see also: https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/spectacularly-transparent-auralic-taurus-mkii)
It's not about loudness, it's about dynamism/how hard or strong the sound is. XLR is softer. Multiple reviews mention a difference. Of course balanced is louder. This amp appears to be an exception in the variation between RCA versus XLR to the point where you might not prefer balanced due to how the sound is affected.
https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/spectacularly-transparent-auralic-taurus-mkii-page-2
The single ended jack comes across as being more direct, more dynamic, more lively. The balanced output seems a bit more nuanced and subtle, with more expansive soundstage and more precise imaging.
Read more at https://www.innerfidelity.com/conte...uralic-taurus-mkii-page-2#qMifSjzTUxIHZfWV.99
It's not about loudness, it's about dynamism/how hard or strong the sound is. XLR is softer. Multiple reviews mention a difference. Of course balanced is louder. This amp appears to be an exception in the variation between RCA versus XLR to the point where you might not prefer balanced due to how the sound is affected.
Totally agree with this. Even when volume matching there is a difference on the two outputs. Not entirely sure why, i know the OI is slightly different (>1 vs. 3ish iirc). Some have said balanced can reduce crossfade which is something i feel is plausible here. It's somewhat of a 1,5 amps in one the Taurus to my ears at least.
It's somewhat of a 1,5 amps in one the Taurus to my ears at least.
Or a .75 of an amp if you'd prefer somewhat more dynamic sound with somewhat better space.
intlsubband
500+ Head-Fier
These comments seem strange to me. I have hooked up my DAC to the Taurus with both balanced and unbalanced outputs in parralell, so I can directly toggle between the two inputs with 1 click on the amp, and it seems clear there are no discernible differences between balanced and unbalanced output, however all the sound different is between the balanced and unbalanced headphones output.
What differences are you hearing between the outputs?
intlsubband
500+ Head-Fier
The balanced headphone output has better soundstage and dynamics. I understand that there is a fully separate topography, and when I have a headphone plugged in balanced, I get the different sound signature if I choose unbalanced output option (it still produces the sound via the balanced output, but with different characteristic).
But when I switch between the different inputs, with the same output, I hear no difference.
But when I switch between the different inputs, with the same output, I hear no difference.
Better dynamics meaning fuller, stronger sound (e.g. bass) or do you mean something else by that? I'll point to this quote from that Innerfidelity review again:
The single ended jack comes across as being more direct, more dynamic, more lively. The balanced output seems a bit more nuanced and subtle, with more expansive soundstage and more precise imaging.
Read more at https://www.innerfidelity.com/conte...uralic-taurus-mkii-page-2#qMifSjzTUxIHZfWV.99
Noldir
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Posts
- 239
- Likes
- 47
It would be helpful if you describe how you're listening exactly what is the source you're feeding into the amp and what kind of headphones are you listening to?
Or a .75 of an amp if you'd prefer somewhat more dynamic sound with somewhat better space.
Half full or half empty glass i guess. Touché though.
intlsubband
500+ Head-Fier
It would be helpful if you describe how you're listening exactly what is the source you're feeding into the amp and what kind of headphones are you listening to?
If this was aimed at me, then the chain goes: PC -> usb cable -> Antelope Zodiac Gold DAC -> balanced & unbalanced outputs -> cables -> Taurus -> HD800S / PM-1
Noldir
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2014
- Posts
- 239
- Likes
- 47
Ah sorry, no. I ment to ask @rutter. Still, interesting combo!If this was aimed at me, then the chain goes: PC -> usb cable -> Antelope Zodiac Gold DAC -> balanced & unbalanced outputs -> cables -> Taurus -> HD800S / PM-1
It would be helpful if you describe how you're listening exactly what is the source you're feeding into the amp and what kind of headphones are you listening to?
Gumby -> Taurus MKII -> single-ended LCD-X