Elephas
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2005
- Posts
- 3,259
- Likes
- 15
Sorry, I posted this earlier in post #78. The W5000 pads fit very well on the A950LTD. The thickness of the pads are different, so it's possible the sound will be different.
Quote:
Quote:
Hi, welcome to Head-Fi.
The A950LTD sounds OK driven directly from a 5G iPod, while I wouldn't do so with the K701 or HD650. The A950LTD does improve when driven by the RSA Raptor or AT-HA5000, though the difference isn't as much as the K701/HD650. I usually listen to the K701 with the Raptor and the HD650 with the Lehmann BCL or Lavry DA10. I think it's more likely for people to think the A950LTD sounds good enough with more modest amplification. You can think of it as being good enough to not need a fancy amp. The K701 and HD650 are more demanding and scale more readily.
The A950LTD sounds very different from the K701/HD650. The closed A950LTD has much better isolation and doesn't leak sound, unlike the K701. The A950LTD is more forward-sounding, closed-in and less expansive, while the K701 and HD650 are more distant-sounding, have better air and larger soundstages. At this point I prefer the K701 and HD650 over the A950LTD.
The A950LTD's bass impact seems a bit higher than the HD650's, though it doesn't have the HD650's warmth or smoothness. Both are relatively warm and dark-sounding compared to the K701, SA5000, RS-1 or AD2000. The HD650 has a more relaxing and liquid-like sound that's very enjoyable. I think both the A950LTD and HD650 lack some details, particularly in the upper-midrange area.
The K701 has a much different sound than the A950LTD. The K701's large soundstage, air and precise and delicate sound is almost diametrically opposite to the A950LTD's more closed-in, solid, bassy and iimpactful sound. This probably applies to the K701 vs. the L3000, A900LTD and A900 as well. I think the K701 is more neutral-sounding, though this may sometimes be a negative quality. The A950LTD generates more emotions and impact behind the music, especially electronica where its bass is much more fun and uplifting. It also does well with fast-paced dance music. I prefer the K701's superior air, soundstage and details for classical, downtempo electronica and slower paced vocals. The K701's midrange also sounds especially good with female vocals such as Patricia Barber.
The K701 is one of my favorite headphones; this can be inferred from the description of my preferences above. However, I often feel more involved and immersed in the music while listening to the W5000, L3000 and other headphones while the K701 can sometimes seem too bland, detached and overly clinical. Despite my claim that I'm more of an airhead than basshead, the K701's bass and lower midrange doesn't have enough slam and impact for some of my favorite types of music such as electronica chill out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elephas /img/forum/go_quote.gif The plastic part on the A950LTD where the pad wraps around is much thicker than the W5000's. Installation is more difficult. One way is to start with the pad upside down and wrapping it over the thinnest part of the plastic first. Then slowly slide the pad around 180 degrees while continually pulling and wrapping it over the plastic. Note that the W5000's left and right pads are different and specific for each side. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by teNtiOn /img/forum/go_quote.gif How's A950LTD comparing with K701/HD650 ? Do it need an amp ? |
Hi, welcome to Head-Fi.
The A950LTD sounds OK driven directly from a 5G iPod, while I wouldn't do so with the K701 or HD650. The A950LTD does improve when driven by the RSA Raptor or AT-HA5000, though the difference isn't as much as the K701/HD650. I usually listen to the K701 with the Raptor and the HD650 with the Lehmann BCL or Lavry DA10. I think it's more likely for people to think the A950LTD sounds good enough with more modest amplification. You can think of it as being good enough to not need a fancy amp. The K701 and HD650 are more demanding and scale more readily.
The A950LTD sounds very different from the K701/HD650. The closed A950LTD has much better isolation and doesn't leak sound, unlike the K701. The A950LTD is more forward-sounding, closed-in and less expansive, while the K701 and HD650 are more distant-sounding, have better air and larger soundstages. At this point I prefer the K701 and HD650 over the A950LTD.
The A950LTD's bass impact seems a bit higher than the HD650's, though it doesn't have the HD650's warmth or smoothness. Both are relatively warm and dark-sounding compared to the K701, SA5000, RS-1 or AD2000. The HD650 has a more relaxing and liquid-like sound that's very enjoyable. I think both the A950LTD and HD650 lack some details, particularly in the upper-midrange area.
The K701 has a much different sound than the A950LTD. The K701's large soundstage, air and precise and delicate sound is almost diametrically opposite to the A950LTD's more closed-in, solid, bassy and iimpactful sound. This probably applies to the K701 vs. the L3000, A900LTD and A900 as well. I think the K701 is more neutral-sounding, though this may sometimes be a negative quality. The A950LTD generates more emotions and impact behind the music, especially electronica where its bass is much more fun and uplifting. It also does well with fast-paced dance music. I prefer the K701's superior air, soundstage and details for classical, downtempo electronica and slower paced vocals. The K701's midrange also sounds especially good with female vocals such as Patricia Barber.
The K701 is one of my favorite headphones; this can be inferred from the description of my preferences above. However, I often feel more involved and immersed in the music while listening to the W5000, L3000 and other headphones while the K701 can sometimes seem too bland, detached and overly clinical. Despite my claim that I'm more of an airhead than basshead, the K701's bass and lower midrange doesn't have enough slam and impact for some of my favorite types of music such as electronica chill out.