Got the DT600 few days back and to my ears they're definitely an improvement over DT200.
i don't have any measurement to show but yeah, at least when i listened to them and A/B them they're an improvement to my ears,slightly better details and the most obvious is the bass response,dynamic driver kind of bass..jaw dropped. Lol
At least the initial impression is off to a good start. I blind bought it, it need not to be a giant slayer. As long as it punches slightly above its price point and I will be happy. I am coming from the Fiio FA1.
Got the DT600 few days back and to my ears they're definitely an improvement over DT200.
i don't have any measurement to show but yeah, at least when i listened to them and A/B them they're an improvement to my ears,slightly better details and the most obvious is the bass response,dynamic driver kind of bass..jaw dropped. Lol
CCZ Plume is quite a bad set, I think that's too low a bar haha.
For the $239 USD asking price for the Plume, there's much better sets out there (and even cheaper sets too) that have better technicalities and timbre. My main beef with the Plume was the bad midbass bleed that was incoherent (DD bass speed much slower than mid/treble BAs, especially at faster/complex tracks).
The Plume was caught in some dubious advertised drivers too and CCZ had to withdraw the entire product from the market.
Hahahaha, better than Plume! Soundstage wise, plume is better and also the sub bass response, but everything else, DT600 is better,DT600’s bass response is no slouch either.
Alright, just making this post since some wont let it go.
3 graphs that looks very similar. So if my unit has bad QC, you are looking at a pretty big sample size for something at this price. Also, both my L and R units have the same tuning, which is another factor for why this is the intended tuning.
Alright, just making this post since some wont let it go.
3 graphs that looks very similar. So if my unit has bad QC, you are looking at a pretty big sample size for something at this price. Also, both my L and R units have the same tuning, which is another factor for why this is the intended tuning.
Alright, just making this post since some wont let it go.
3 graphs that looks very similar. So if my unit has bad QC, you are looking at a pretty big sample size for something at this price. Also, both my L and R units have the same tuning, which is another factor for why this is the intended tuning.
My DT600 is in. And it comes with an 80 ohm impedance adapter. Goodness, it's such a mixed bag of impressions with and without the impedance adapter and then with different sources.
My DT600 is in. And it comes with an 80 ohm impedance adapter. Goodness, it's such a mixed bag of impressions with and without the impedance adapter and then with different sources.
With impedance adapter it is way better. Without the adapter, the bass is like bloated especially if it is on my MacBook Air. Out of my iPhone 11 w/ dongle it is not as bassy. But this is so weird, it is pretty rare for any manufacturer to ship with an impedance adapter. The iems should sound ok without any form of impedance adapter right?
With impedance adapter it is way better. Without the adapter, the bass is like bloated especially if it is on my MacBook Air. Out of my iPhone 11 w/ dongle it is not as bassy. But this is so weird, it is pretty rare for any manufacturer to ship with an impedance adapter. The iems should sound ok without any form of impedance adapter right?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
