Audio-Technica CKX Information & Reviews Thread
Dec 23, 2013 at 1:20 AM Post #32 of 63
If you guys are interested, I just posted a review of ATH-CKX9iS and ATH-CKX7iS with a ton of pictures in here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2581215
 
Don't want to duplicate everything, so just follow link above.  In a summary, 9iS was VERY impressive, more impressive than Senns CX985 I received reviewed.  And for a price of under $100, you can't beat it.
 
Feb 15, 2014 at 9:20 AM Post #35 of 63
I ran for 2 hours today whilst listening to Paul van Dyk's album Reflection today. I must say they stay very securely on ears and do not fall off. My ear canals are small so usually even iems tend to fall after some time but these ones did not. So I think they're perfect for running, biking etc.
 
The sound has indeed a V-shape. They are really so good for electronic music. Reflection sounded just amazing. I listened to some rock songs just to see how it handles the mids, and although they sounded enjoyable, they did not sound as amazing as they did on electronic music. Sp I think these are great for electronic, pop, general listening and good for rock, classical, jazz (just not amazing).
 
Feb 19, 2014 at 10:43 PM Post #36 of 63
hello, a new ckx 5 user here.
i take it and like it more than ckx9 because i think ckx9's bass sound muddier and... somewhat harsher.
ckx5's bass seems slow, but i think i can adapt with that :D

anyway, i also think the imaging of these IEMs is amazing.
you can't get a 3D staging IEM like this below 50 US$..
 
.. but it's all my ears of course, our mileage may vary :D
 
Mar 8, 2014 at 5:51 AM Post #38 of 63
More impressions on CKX5/7 please, especially after burn-in. They seem to have a similar design with PFE112 and loved the CKX5 design. What about the comfort, is it similar to PFEs? 
 
Apr 22, 2014 at 8:57 AM Post #41 of 63
Looking at all the impressions here it seems that even the lowest of the CKX range, the CKX5 seems pretty decent against the 7 or 9.
It sounds as if it is better than the CKS55. Anyone have tried both the CKS55 and CKX5?
Or perhaps even some of the lower ended ATH IEM's the CK323/313.
 
May 23, 2014 at 11:52 AM Post #43 of 63
May 30, 2014 at 6:24 AM Post #44 of 63
If anyone is interested en.goldenears.net recently did some measurements on the CKX5 and CKX9.
 
CKX5: http://en.goldenears.net/42223
 
CKX9: http://en.goldenears.net/40595
 
It seems like the 5 beats the 9 in mainly treble texture, everything else is pretty similar. Though of course this is just artificial measurements.
 
Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM Post #45 of 63
I recently bought a pair of Audio Technica CKX9is IEMs and they are very good. The stereo separation is good and wide, the bass is good, tight and punchy but I find the highs a bit piercing but still good. The IEMs are also comfortable and stay firmly in my ears maintaining good sound.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top