Audio Technica ATH-M50 - What's all the fuss about?
Mar 27, 2012 at 8:19 PM Post #61 of 82
Could just be minor production variances that yield noticeable differences in impressions.  My white boxed M50S was great.
 
Mar 27, 2012 at 9:20 PM Post #62 of 82
Having heard and owned both blue-box and white-box variants of the ATH-M50 (though no special editions), I can confirm that the earlier version had more bass emphasis and much more recessed mids. The later version is still a bit recessed to my ears, though, if much improved from the old, bassy version.
 
Mar 27, 2012 at 10:19 PM Post #63 of 82
Having heard and owned both blue-box and white-box variants of the ATH-M50 (though no special editions), I can confirm that the earlier version had more bass emphasis and much more recessed mids. The later version is still a bit recessed to my ears, though, if much improved from the old, bassy version.


mine were white box straight cable, the recessed mids are noticeable.
 
Mar 27, 2012 at 10:25 PM Post #64 of 82
even though I wasnt around when the m50 was getting rave reviews, I believe they were around $100 when they first released. this is a pretty good value for what they give you, assuming you are into their sound sig.

from my limited exp with the m50, I didn't find the mids to be extremely recessed, but clearly not forward in any way whatsoever.
 
Mar 27, 2012 at 10:28 PM Post #65 of 82


Quote:
Ps: The m50s on commute? You are a brave man
biggrin.gif
among all the Beats-users. I'm sure a few have given you condescending looks.



I give all Beats-users the evil eye.
 
Mar 28, 2012 at 10:01 AM Post #66 of 82
yes, this is all relative. M50' mids may not be as recessed as some other phones, but in my collection, they are on the more recessed side.
 
Quote:
even though I wasnt around when the m50 was getting rave reviews, I believe they were around $100 when they first released. this is a pretty good value for what they give you, assuming you are into their sound sig.

from my limited exp with the m50, I didn't find the mids to be extremely recessed, but clearly not forward in any way whatsoever.



 
 
Feb 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM Post #68 of 82
I had a pair and was definitely disappointed by them. They were stolen and it took me a couple weeks to even notice, ha. Hopefully the person that got them enjoys them more than I did.
 
Feb 9, 2013 at 3:34 PM Post #69 of 82
I am looking to upgrade from my Sony MDR XB-500s. I thought the M50s would be a good choice because of the improved clarity without sacrificing all of the bass. However, the idea of overly recessed mids kind of turns me off. Does anybody have any recommendations? I listen to a variety of music including a lot of hip hop and electronic music so I don't want to sacrifice too much bass extension or impact.
 
Feb 9, 2013 at 4:03 PM Post #70 of 82
Quote:
I am looking to upgrade from my Sony MDR XB-500s. I thought the M50s would be a good choice because of the improved clarity without sacrificing all of the bass. However, the idea of overly recessed mids kind of turns me off. Does anybody have any recommendations? I listen to a variety of music including a lot of hip hop and electronic music so I don't want to sacrifice too much bass extension or impact.

 
Try ultrasone HFI models, they do a better job than M50. 
 
Feb 9, 2013 at 4:40 PM Post #71 of 82
My M50's mids don't sound recessed. And to say that the HFI models do a "better job" is a pretty silly statement. They both have their strengths, the HFI's being better bass, the M50's being better all-rounders with better treble.
 
Feb 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM Post #72 of 82
Quote:
My M50's mids don't sound recessed. And to say that the HFI models do a "better job" is a pretty silly statement. They both have their strengths, the HFI's being better bass, the M50's being better all-rounders with better treble.

 
M50's have overpowered bass mate 
confused.gif
 the HFI-580 focus on mids with a tight bass response, without being bloated. 
 
your point is "invalid" 
wink.gif

 
Feb 9, 2013 at 7:26 PM Post #73 of 82
I have the M50s "white box" and, to my ears, bass is not at all overempowered, nor are the mids quite so recessed (a little bit, not as much as I've read here). They're actually pretty great headphones, and I think most flaming comes from people who has not actually heard them, just like they were getting undeserved hype, now they're getting  undeserved hate.
 
Their greatest flaw is the harsh highs IMO, but it's not such a problem. I actually find it suprising that people finds the bass overemphasized, sure it's strong, but all my other headphones have even stronger bass.
 
I guess every ear is absolutely different.
 
Feb 9, 2013 at 7:52 PM Post #74 of 82
I think "all the fuss" is about the fact that these sound fantastic for the price point. Personally I think if they had a little better separation they'd best the DT770''s. They certainly beat them in the Bass dept. All in all a great buy with great bass and useful for many genres of music. THAT'S what all the fuss is about. Show me a better phone for $129.00.... 
wink.gif

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top