I think Grokit has a point. We are in a typical web stalemate with both sides holding their views in a religious fashion.
**Steve cannot show any DBTs that prove that LPs cannot be magnetized.
**I cannot show any DBTs that prove that LPs can be magnetized. I can show some scientific measurements but of course these are rejected by Steve as being "not rigorous".
So we can do either of two things:
1. Create a DBT to prove either Steve's or my point. This requires money, time and a faith in DBTs that I simply do not have.
2. Accept that subjective evaluations do hold value and experiment with non-magnetized and magnetized LPs.
For me, I think #2 is a valid path if less scientifically "rigorous" than some here want.
If we go with #1, then we will have very little content to legitimately discuss here.
**Steve cannot show any DBTs that prove that LPs cannot be magnetized.
**I cannot show any DBTs that prove that LPs can be magnetized. I can show some scientific measurements but of course these are rejected by Steve as being "not rigorous".
So we can do either of two things:
1. Create a DBT to prove either Steve's or my point. This requires money, time and a faith in DBTs that I simply do not have.
2. Accept that subjective evaluations do hold value and experiment with non-magnetized and magnetized LPs.
For me, I think #2 is a valid path if less scientifically "rigorous" than some here want.
If we go with #1, then we will have very little content to legitimately discuss here.