1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.

    Dismiss Notice

Audio Quality Rankings

Discussion in 'Sound Science' started by freakydrew, Feb 3, 2010.
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
  1. MrGreen
    The quality of lossless filetypes depends on the media it was ripped from.........
  2. danielghofrani


    how about HDtracks.com studio master files straight from the Studio!?
  3. khaos974
    Depends on the mastering/mixing engineer.[​IMG]
    A well mastered track converted to AAC sounds better than a badly mastered one at 24/96.
    And to answer your previous question, a 24/96 track theoretically sounds better than the same track downsampled at 16/44, whether it's audible or not is another issue.
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Share This Page