They differ quite a bit. I've written much about the two, but it was all about a year ago so hard to dig up at this point. But you're talking about the Delta-Sigma vs R-2R sound difference:
- NFB-28's Sabre DAC is very bright with forward, digital highs. This gives the impression of more detail and a bigger soundstage. For a Sabre, it's a very smooth implementation. Much easier to listen to than the poor implementations.
- DAC-19 is much more natural with treble that feels almost recessed when you're used to the Sabre in the NFB-28. Once you accommodate, you hear that the treble is much more natural feeling and sounds much less digital. The tonality in general is much more realistic, a major draw of R2R DAC's. And there is a lot of detail on display across the spectrum and not just in the bright treble of the Sabre.
To me, the tonality and realism of the DAC-19 is the big draw. I play drums so it's easiest for me to hear that realism in the cymbals. Once you hear the DAC-19, you realize that the treble "detail" on the Sabre just sounds like digital static instead of the metallic shimmer of a cymbal. Piano players and guitarists have also told me that those instruments sound much more realistic on R2R.
Hope this helps. I've written a LOT about it in the past year...