Audiophiliac
100+ Head-Fier
Listening to my newest addition, a DI-20:
I2S wins a simply more clarity to our soundstage's presentation award, and finally gives us a trouble-free original presentation, but before that, coax shoves all your data through a big fat same $ single pipeline. Returning to coax, also $20, my space got really messy from those 3 lines sharing, but the data line got the heft from diameter it will always appreciate. The other 3 lines are getting packed into that same 1, so goodbye that new 4 mini-cable offer, albeit with it's original presentation and soundstage simply intact award, but for now coax, for the required meat on it's body. Max $ on the data line's pipe is what some users would prefer, although a 2nd 3-smaller-cables addition could be our best 4-line I2S transmission option.
Please standardize a 3-lines AES cable connection + a single coax cable for the data line I2S solution, with it's big fat pipeline, VS that tiny little hdmi crap I2S cable choice.
Back to currently, my music's meat is full of gaps, because it shared it's bandwidth with 3 other lines-worth of other data. It's not present in the HDMI cable.
Sony and Phillips did you a favour, letting the body have more underlying existence, this way. Engineers, please un-congest me by adding a 3-line cable for the 2nd-4th most important factors. For me, HDMI loses all of it's data's body, before correcting my new mess in the first place after that, so HDMI<Coax.
I2S wins a simply more clarity to our soundstage's presentation award, and finally gives us a trouble-free original presentation, but before that, coax shoves all your data through a big fat same $ single pipeline. Returning to coax, also $20, my space got really messy from those 3 lines sharing, but the data line got the heft from diameter it will always appreciate. The other 3 lines are getting packed into that same 1, so goodbye that new 4 mini-cable offer, albeit with it's original presentation and soundstage simply intact award, but for now coax, for the required meat on it's body. Max $ on the data line's pipe is what some users would prefer, although a 2nd 3-smaller-cables addition could be our best 4-line I2S transmission option.
Please standardize a 3-lines AES cable connection + a single coax cable for the data line I2S solution, with it's big fat pipeline, VS that tiny little hdmi crap I2S cable choice.
Back to currently, my music's meat is full of gaps, because it shared it's bandwidth with 3 other lines-worth of other data. It's not present in the HDMI cable.
Sony and Phillips did you a favour, letting the body have more underlying existence, this way. Engineers, please un-congest me by adding a 3-line cable for the 2nd-4th most important factors. For me, HDMI loses all of it's data's body, before correcting my new mess in the first place after that, so HDMI<Coax.
Last edited: