Audio-GD DI-20
Oct 7, 2020 at 9:35 AM Post #2,076 of 5,351
I assume the Beta2 of 3.93 is intended to be the best choice for external clock and the Beta 3 or 4 of 4.07 is best for internal clock.

Is that a reasonable assumption?
 
Last edited:
Oct 7, 2020 at 12:55 PM Post #2,078 of 5,351
I assume the Beta2 of 3.93 is intended to be the best choice for external clock and the Beta 3 or 4 of 4.07 is best for internal clock.

Is that a reasonable assumption?
I think they are two different design appoaches (branches) regarding timing, hence the two different sound flavors.

I am with 3.93b2/external/i2s/parallel and and i enjoy the ride very much. Like a more resolved 3.93.
 
Oct 7, 2020 at 3:10 PM Post #2,081 of 5,351
I'm just not in the mood to test the newest versions so I look forward to everyone's comparisons of the new 3.93 and the new 4.07.
I'm especially interested in the external clock improvements....
 
Oct 7, 2020 at 3:37 PM Post #2,082 of 5,351
I'm just not in the mood to test the newest versions so I look forward to everyone's comparisons of the new 3.93 and the new 4.07.
I'm especially interested in the external clock improvements....
I'm currently using the new 4.07 FW version and I find it to be very musical. Better instrument separation and soundstage width and depth. For me, it has also quieted the PCM/DSD switching noise. I have not tried the new 3.93 version. I plan to do that tonight.
 
Oct 7, 2020 at 5:39 PM Post #2,084 of 5,351
I think 3.93b2 is awesome. A bit more resolved and cleaner than 3.93. Very smooth. I haven't tried the last 4.07. So far, this branch of fws is not as smooth. For me, 3.93b is perfect. But i figure your preference will depend on your setup.

It is easy for me to swap fws as i have a dedicated mini-pc for that purpose under 3 feet away from the di20he. I will try the last 4.07 but not tonight.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top