Music Alchemist
Pokémon trainer of headphones
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Posts
- 20,092
- Likes
- 2,308
Music,
Call me Alchemist.

Thank you very much for your thorough post on this topic, and for the welcome!
No prob. I put a bit of effort into it. Too bad your thread title doesn't reflect the diverse content of the thread. (Less people will see it because of that.)
I guess figuring out your favorite sound signature is like figuring out your favorite flavor or brand of wine, based on that terminology link. lol
You may find that you prefer specific headphones with certain genres.
Yeah the mastering apparently has a lot to do with it.
The mastering has everything to do with it.

By the way, have you ever heard an unmastered album? Some of them sound really bad before the mastering engineer works his magic.
I did use dbPoweramp last week to convert some FLAC files to ALAC, and I will say it did a FANTASTIC job!
I love dBpoweramp for ripping CDs, converting files, editing tags and artwork, and even doing weird experiments with audio.
I thought AAC files were just basically the Apple "version" of mp3s? So ok they're better, but I'm hesitant to believe that an AAC is really the same sounding as a lossless track. I'd honestly have to test myself or be tested on that to see if I couldn't tell a difference.
AAC stands for Advanced Audio Coding, is the successor to MP3, and is a superior lossy format. It was not developed by Apple, though they did increase its popularity with the iTunes Store.
I'm not entirely sure that it's impossible to distinguish between 256 kbps AAC and lossless. In my own listening tests, I thought I could sometimes hear subtle differences, but it could have been my imagination. They were only casual (albeit extensive) tests, at any rate.
Either way, if you need the extra space for a portable player, you might as well compress your files, and if you have plenty of space, you don't need to compress them.
What's really the difference between say a good $200-$300 pair of headphones and a $1000 pair? Would most ppl be able to tell the difference?
Aside from hearing for yourself (which you can do by going to meets and having auditions at shops), I suggest reading the high-end section of the latest Head-Fi Buying Guide to get a general idea of what they have to offer. For more details, there are endless reviews published online.
Anyone who isn't deaf can hear the difference between headphones, but price is only one factor. There are headphones that sound downright awful in every price bracket, so spending more money doesn't guarantee anything. If you ever decide to upgrade, plenty of members here can guide you.
I'll consider the Focal pair, though I'd read they weren't the most comfortable to wear (http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/innerfidelitys-wall-fame-full-size-sealed). I'm gonna check out the prices on Black Friday and am hoping one of those on my Amazon wish list go down below $200, though I may just go before then and buy a Sony or Sennheiser pair. I'm not looking to go over $200, and I know Amazon will (somewhat) help with that.
There are comfort and build quality issues with those, yes.
From this list Music, which one is your next favorite (aside from the Focal ones):
In no particular order....................Beats Studio Over-Ear Headphones, Beats Pro Over-Ear Headphone, V-MODA Crossfade M-100 Over-Ear, NAD VISO HP50, Sony MDR-1A, Sony MDR-1R, Harman Kardon NC (noise-cancelling), and Sennheiser HD 598.
The M-100. Read this InnerFidelity review to get a better feel about them.
(But if you aren't going to exceed $200, why ask about $300+ headphones?)
Oh yeah, and do you think cable headphones are superior to bluetooth ones? I've heard ppl say yes on that. Just wanted your opinion.
The sound quality of wired headphones (at least the good ones) is superior to that of wireless headphones by a wide margin. Don't even bother with wireless headphones unless you need them for a specific purpose.