F1REStarter
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2011
- Posts
- 126
- Likes
- 20
I liked the bubinga wood best so I chose that
Come on, give them a break.
They are a very young company and they are figuring things out as they go.
They know how to make a top sounding product, the aspect that's been lacking up unitl now is the build quality of those said products.
But they are trying to solve these.
Look at their newly announced products the HE-400i and HE-560, both having a very different design and significantly lighter weight, their upcoming Jade II electrostat sharing that design.
Their new headphones will weight around 350g, that's almost 1/2 of what the newest Audez'e cans weight and this reduction should bring a significant increase in comfort, along with their redesigned headband.
I am not saying their products are great build quality wise, but they've been marginally improving over time, while the sound quality of those has matched and surpassed other audiophile brands in a very short time.
Glad you're liking them. I agree that a warm front end benefits the XC's a lot. They sound better on the Lyr than the Mjolnir or Woo WA22, which is exactly the opposite with the X's.
Enjoy!
BTW, which wood did you choose?
I find it strange that the EF-6 has a balanced output but only single-ended inputs.
Ordering my XCs in a few days
Anyone have a chance to compare vegan vs leather, in sound and isolation qualities?
Leather for looks!
Audeze pads are attached with double sided tape, not glued on. The pads are easily removed, replaceable and are reusable as well. I've had my leather and microsuede pads swapped several times on my LCD-3s.
As someone who has tried both, what do you feel the differences are in practice?
Audeze pads are attached with double sided tape, not glued on. The pads are easily removed, replaceable and are reusable as well. I've had my leather and microsuede pads swapped several times on my LCD-3s.