Spektykles
Head-Fier
Bad range are due to bad signal layout design/antenna, since all the QCC chips have limited power output. Some of the better design have huge gain antenna or fancy one like ceramic or laser etched one.
I see the same behavior with the Sennheiser BTD 600 (and the Qudelix). Seems the antennas in these transmitters just can't do more, for whatever reason (size, quality, power delivery, processing, I don't know).4. Aptx Adaptive gets quite low bitrates compared to from my sony phone. This appears to be range sensitive. only getting >400kbps within a few cm range.
A bit more testing reveals it manages aptx HD across the whole house through several walls with no drop outs or issues. The Qudelix reports the constant 500+ kbps as you'd expect for HD. It's possible that other artefacts in the signal are being introduced while in HD but the throttling of the Adaptive bit rate seems to be more than just a matter of range.I see the same behavior with the Sennheiser BTD 600 (and the Qudelix). Seems the antennas in these transmitters just can't do more, for whatever reason (size, quality, power delivery, processing, I don't know).
Adaptive also generally has lower bitrate than most of the other codecs, though; that doesn't mean the quality can't still be good. There's limits, of course. But bitrate alone is just one of a bunch of factors.
I'd love to see a transmitter with much better range, though. I guess we probably won't get that at such a small form factor, or it might be significantly more expensive.
That's actually (kind of) supported, but probably dongle manufacturer simply didn't make use of that feature. There are 2 quality modes: low latency and high quality (with 96 kHz). But Adaptive is such a mess. AFAIK QCC5124 used in Qudelix 5k only has aptX Adaptive r1.0 which lacks certain features. But it will probably still decrease the bitrate to circumvent dropouts even in HQ mode.I also dislike a lot how these devices don't give you more control over Adaptive. Hell, even for LDAC with its 3 fixed bitrate settings you can say that you want to prefer high quality, even if it makes the connection drop.
There exists generic SDK for these chips, so it obviously can support that.Actually, now I'm wondering if there is any software that just addresses the Qualcomm chip inside directly...?
Probably no. While there is something close to that (pydbg), I'm almost confident that it won't work for all of them.Which then might work for any dongle using it?
Tons of discussion about it in this thread. Use search.Anybody heard or tried this transmitter? Seems to have newest aptX adaptive lossless.
https://www.aptx.com/products/nura-bluetooth-5-3-audio-transmitter
https://www.nurasound.com/products/bluetooth-audio-transmitter
Probably not. Would be highly surprised if so.Seems to have newest aptX adaptive lossless.
Unfortunately, they don't mention the chip used, so the following is only a speculation. If it's the same QCC3056/3040 used in other dongles then it has no advantages compared to them (except, maybe, better control software). But if it has recent QCC3086 then in addition to all of that it will have LE Audio (LC3, aptX Adaptive/Lite) and that's it. Most likely they didn't go for QCC5 (and 60$ for QCC3 is a robbery tbh), so this will only have SBC, aptX and aptX Adaptive (not even HD or LL. Not that LL is useful and well-supported, but still).