Quote:
Originally Posted by infinitesymphony /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I did see the other measurement, but didn't think that 0.5 dB was a significant improvement, especially when that range didn't include the majority of fundamental frequencies (i.e. under 300 Hz).
It's up to you to do the research about low power ratings, high crossovers, and poor extension. But ultimately, the choice is yours. For $600, it's not difficult to find a pair of active monitors that have more power, flatter frequency response, and bass extension without the aid of a subwoofer (ex. Event TR8 XL, Mackie MR8).
|
Hello infinitesymphony:
I hope you and others don't mind me posting here. I just thought I would chime in.
First, it is important to understand that our design philosophy requires the use of a subwoofer with all of our systems. This includes our larger mid-field systems, such as
Big Blue. If you are interested why we do this, you can follow
this link to our website, where discuss in greater detail our
general design philosophy.
With regard to "low" power ratings and high crossover etc; our system designs are application driven and for this given application, this system design works extremely well. We have many thousands of these systems in the field, being used for music, TV, post & game production, by companies such as Electronic Arts, Apple, ESPN, Lucasfilm, to name but a few. Our users and
numerous reviewers seem more than satisfied.
But without listening for yourself, it would seem to be hard to convince you.
Just another biased opinion!
Cheers!