JaZZ
Headphoneus Supremus
Quote:
Sure. But it doesn't replace a sensitive hearing when it comes to hear or not hear subtleties beyond sound-transducer level.
Quote:
Within the standards of Head-Fi and people with audiophile demands my hearing is absolutely normal. See the equipment forums crowded by people who all believe to hear the things that «only bats and dogs can hear». In turn your apparent relative insensitivity seems to disqualify you according to this very same standard.
Quote:
Maybe. Nevertheless, this seems to be an inevitable «side-effect» of intensive occupation with sound and high-end equipment. The hearing threshold expands further and further. It's not just a burden, because unveiled subtleties in audio reproduction also serve for a more intimate and touching musical experience. And a less «technical» characteristic by removing corresponding artifacts in less sophisticated equipment also helps. Finally, exploring the sonic level within the music can also be fun: As enjoying a well-prepared dinner with all its nuances is more fun than just reading the recipe.
.
Originally Posted by bigshot /img/forum/go_quote.gif It helps to be informed to understand the realistic limits of one's perception. It also helps to discern the relative merits of one improvement over another. I think being informed is a good thing. |
Sure. But it doesn't replace a sensitive hearing when it comes to hear or not hear subtleties beyond sound-transducer level.
Quote:
But even assuming that you actually *can* hear things only bats and dogs can hear... How does that qualify you to give advice on stereo equipment to people with normal human hearing? |
Within the standards of Head-Fi and people with audiophile demands my hearing is absolutely normal. See the equipment forums crowded by people who all believe to hear the things that «only bats and dogs can hear». In turn your apparent relative insensitivity seems to disqualify you according to this very same standard.
Quote:
Freakish hearing ability is no more of a thing to be proud of as extra toes on one foot or multiple nipples. There really isn't anything musical to hear in superaudible frequencies. And there's no advantage to being extra sensitive to artifacts and noise in the signal. In fact, that's a detriment to enjoyment of recorded music. |
Maybe. Nevertheless, this seems to be an inevitable «side-effect» of intensive occupation with sound and high-end equipment. The hearing threshold expands further and further. It's not just a burden, because unveiled subtleties in audio reproduction also serve for a more intimate and touching musical experience. And a less «technical» characteristic by removing corresponding artifacts in less sophisticated equipment also helps. Finally, exploring the sonic level within the music can also be fun: As enjoying a well-prepared dinner with all its nuances is more fun than just reading the recipe.
.