headfever
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2009
- Posts
- 236
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
I want to share with you of one of my "discover" by a mistake. Once I ripped some tracks directly from CDs, after few hours listening, I felt the sound quality has slightly changed, Then I hook to PC to check the files size, it changed my setting from 320KPS to 128KBPS, I have not noticed it at the first listing. I am amaze the low bit rate processing capability of AMP3.
Then, I try the 96kpbs MP3 files curiously, to my suprise, I can still live with it. the rhythem is still there, only lose few details.
I normally listening to AMP3 with 192KBPS mp3 files, 1/3 are 320kbps.
You have an AMP3 too, you can test it by yourself and share your experies with us.
Originally Posted by dana789 /img/forum/go_quote.gif I've read on the amp3 threads that the AMP3 was designed to work well with mp3 files encoded at lower rates. Can anyone verify that the AMP3 has special capabilities in this regard? Not sure how one would do such a test, I don't see how a standard ABX would work. I know some folks in this community can describe artifacts found in the typical 128k mp3 in some detail, do any of them think those artifacts are diminished with the AMP3 compared to other players? |
I want to share with you of one of my "discover" by a mistake. Once I ripped some tracks directly from CDs, after few hours listening, I felt the sound quality has slightly changed, Then I hook to PC to check the files size, it changed my setting from 320KPS to 128KBPS, I have not noticed it at the first listing. I am amaze the low bit rate processing capability of AMP3.
Then, I try the 96kpbs MP3 files curiously, to my suprise, I can still live with it. the rhythem is still there, only lose few details.
I normally listening to AMP3 with 192KBPS mp3 files, 1/3 are 320kbps.
You have an AMP3 too, you can test it by yourself and share your experies with us.