scottiebabie
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 1,010
- Likes
- 35
let take a gander at this using the auto analogy as stated...
because we're comparing engines & not tires? granted better tires will let both cars perform better but since both cars have the same tire, then its logical to assume other factors will determine which is the better car. lesser quality tires does not negate the tests because OP is trying to determine engine performance & all things (including tires in this case) being equal, the better engine will still be better engine & will perform as such.
dont know if the auto analogy fits but this is how i would view it. btw its not $50 tires but more like $500 tires compared with $2000 tires so even though its "cheaper" tires, its still good performance tires. atleast thats how i see it.
Quote:
because we're comparing engines & not tires? granted better tires will let both cars perform better but since both cars have the same tire, then its logical to assume other factors will determine which is the better car. lesser quality tires does not negate the tests because OP is trying to determine engine performance & all things (including tires in this case) being equal, the better engine will still be better engine & will perform as such.
dont know if the auto analogy fits but this is how i would view it. btw its not $50 tires but more like $500 tires compared with $2000 tires so even though its "cheaper" tires, its still good performance tires. atleast thats how i see it.
Quote:
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense to test for any performance differences between a 911Turbo and 911GT on a track when you are using some $50 tires you got from Bell Tire? Can you think of atleat 1 reason why this is stupid?
Quote: