chinesekiwi
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
- Posts
- 3,801
- Likes
- 47
Well, these just arrived this morning!
Knowing that these are basically Etymotic ER4's, these are my first Ety IEM's and thus my first encounter with the 'Etymotic sound sig'.
First thing I noticed is that, yes, as stated by others,
* These are very hard to drive IEM's.
With my Cowon D2, which has one of the most powerful internal amps of any DAP on the market, if not the most powerful, I had to bump it up quite a bit (around +12 difference between the im716 and the Denon C700's).
* Sparkly highs and attention to detail, the most detailed IEM's I've heard that's under $100US. If you see my profile, I have alot of sub $100 IEM's.
I haven't heard the Nuforces as of yet, which are a big contender for the best-value IEM's for under US$100.
* Instrument separation is noticeably good but the soundstage is quite narrow however, slightly smaller than the Denon C700's. (I'd say 120 degrees for the Denons vs. 110 degrees for the iM716's).
* Pretty accurate placement of instruments.
* The 'Bass' setting on the pod is a real tossup for me.
I highly do not recommend using it for genres such as rock, metal, anything piano-based as it muddles the rest of the spectrum (not as badly as most cheap earphones though). It basically makes it sound like you're hearing the music underwater which isn't a good feeling, it just saps the enjoyment out of the music for me.
However, with genres such that are bass-oriented such as Drum n Bass, I do recommend using this as it adds a good punch to the bass, while keeping the accuracy and will be significantly better than using an EQ.
In fact, for Cowon owners, I recommend a Mach3Bass setting of 4 with these IEM's for a more balanced sound for DnB, or crank it right up to 6 if you feel like rocking to the bass and don't mind the bass overpowering the rest of the spectrum a bit. However not using it at all is fine also and will still be better than using the EQ to boost the bass.
Like in RAID setups (geek alert!), hardware over software for sound enhancement.
Reason for 6 and no higher = you'll clip the bass otherwise.
See my http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f15/be...ttings-388727/ thread for more details on that + how to get better bass and detail out of your D2.
* Laid-back vocals
* These are the fastest IEM's I've heard for under US$100. I guess that's due to the accuracy of them.
* I highly recommend wearing these (as with other Etymotics) around-the-ear as the microphonics are a killer otherwise. The microphonics are bad even around-the-ear but it goes from "Oh My God, Stop!" to "Just Annoying".
Anyway, some quick comparisons versus others:
(+ being what the iM716 does better, - for cons versus that earphone):
iM716 vs. rest compared below:
+ Detail
+ Isolation
+ Value (all of the below earphones are silly good value really)
+ Accuracy of sound, including bass.
- Microphonics
(still not as bad as CX300's, the king of 'OMG >.<' microphonics)
- Very hard to drive, using more battery life.
- Soundstage
iM716 versus Denon C700/C751
+ Tips (the default Denon tips are a complete joke)
+ Less of an eyesore (the C700/c751 are cone shaped and stick out of your ear a lot)
- Bass quantity
- Tweaking needed to get the best sound for each genre, the Denon C700's have more of an all-round sound in this aspect.
iM716 vs. Head-Direct RE2
+ Tips
Battle of the flange tips! The Etymotic tips actually isolate far more than the large default RE2 tips. The RE2 large biflange tips are more comfortable but don't isolate well at all IMO.
+ Fuller sound (The RE2 are thin sounding)
+ Treble
RE2 owners are probably saying 'What, the RE2's have great treble!'. Let me explain. The iM716's I feel (remember subjectivity) represent the treble better that the RE2's, which I feel 'cheat' by colouring the treble a bit.
Maybe it's 'cold + analytical' versus the warm sound of the RE2, but I still feel the RE2's colour the treble a bit.
+ Looks
Just admit it. The RE2's aren't going to win an IEM beauty contest anytime soon.
+ Actually has some bass (HD mode) unlike RE2.
- Comfort as stated earlier
iM716 vs. Denon C551
+ Tips (as stated in the C751 comparison)
- Bass quantity (C551's = bass head dreamy but inaccurate bass)
No point comparing it versus the SoundMAGIC PL-30 as it's years behind SQ wise. Not saying that the PL-30 is bad for the price however, far from that. I just feel it got the FOTM (flavour of the month) treatment here a bit too much and too hyped up. Will write up a quick KSC-75 comparison later.
I'll burn them in more later tonight and see whether the sound changes.
Are these a keeper? Probably.
Versus the Denon C700's? Damn hard to say which one I'd keep at the moment. Pros and Cons of both (Cons = Denon sound wise, iM716 external factors).
Knowing that these are basically Etymotic ER4's, these are my first Ety IEM's and thus my first encounter with the 'Etymotic sound sig'.
First thing I noticed is that, yes, as stated by others,
* These are very hard to drive IEM's.
With my Cowon D2, which has one of the most powerful internal amps of any DAP on the market, if not the most powerful, I had to bump it up quite a bit (around +12 difference between the im716 and the Denon C700's).
* Sparkly highs and attention to detail, the most detailed IEM's I've heard that's under $100US. If you see my profile, I have alot of sub $100 IEM's.
I haven't heard the Nuforces as of yet, which are a big contender for the best-value IEM's for under US$100.
* Instrument separation is noticeably good but the soundstage is quite narrow however, slightly smaller than the Denon C700's. (I'd say 120 degrees for the Denons vs. 110 degrees for the iM716's).
* Pretty accurate placement of instruments.
* The 'Bass' setting on the pod is a real tossup for me.
I highly do not recommend using it for genres such as rock, metal, anything piano-based as it muddles the rest of the spectrum (not as badly as most cheap earphones though). It basically makes it sound like you're hearing the music underwater which isn't a good feeling, it just saps the enjoyment out of the music for me.
However, with genres such that are bass-oriented such as Drum n Bass, I do recommend using this as it adds a good punch to the bass, while keeping the accuracy and will be significantly better than using an EQ.
In fact, for Cowon owners, I recommend a Mach3Bass setting of 4 with these IEM's for a more balanced sound for DnB, or crank it right up to 6 if you feel like rocking to the bass and don't mind the bass overpowering the rest of the spectrum a bit. However not using it at all is fine also and will still be better than using the EQ to boost the bass.
Like in RAID setups (geek alert!), hardware over software for sound enhancement.
Reason for 6 and no higher = you'll clip the bass otherwise.
See my http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f15/be...ttings-388727/ thread for more details on that + how to get better bass and detail out of your D2.
* Laid-back vocals
* These are the fastest IEM's I've heard for under US$100. I guess that's due to the accuracy of them.
* I highly recommend wearing these (as with other Etymotics) around-the-ear as the microphonics are a killer otherwise. The microphonics are bad even around-the-ear but it goes from "Oh My God, Stop!" to "Just Annoying".
Anyway, some quick comparisons versus others:
(+ being what the iM716 does better, - for cons versus that earphone):
iM716 vs. rest compared below:
+ Detail
+ Isolation
+ Value (all of the below earphones are silly good value really)
+ Accuracy of sound, including bass.
- Microphonics
(still not as bad as CX300's, the king of 'OMG >.<' microphonics)
- Very hard to drive, using more battery life.
- Soundstage
iM716 versus Denon C700/C751
+ Tips (the default Denon tips are a complete joke)
+ Less of an eyesore (the C700/c751 are cone shaped and stick out of your ear a lot)
- Bass quantity
- Tweaking needed to get the best sound for each genre, the Denon C700's have more of an all-round sound in this aspect.
iM716 vs. Head-Direct RE2
+ Tips
Battle of the flange tips! The Etymotic tips actually isolate far more than the large default RE2 tips. The RE2 large biflange tips are more comfortable but don't isolate well at all IMO.
+ Fuller sound (The RE2 are thin sounding)
+ Treble
RE2 owners are probably saying 'What, the RE2's have great treble!'. Let me explain. The iM716's I feel (remember subjectivity) represent the treble better that the RE2's, which I feel 'cheat' by colouring the treble a bit.
Maybe it's 'cold + analytical' versus the warm sound of the RE2, but I still feel the RE2's colour the treble a bit.
+ Looks
Just admit it. The RE2's aren't going to win an IEM beauty contest anytime soon.
+ Actually has some bass (HD mode) unlike RE2.
- Comfort as stated earlier
iM716 vs. Denon C551
+ Tips (as stated in the C751 comparison)
- Bass quantity (C551's = bass head dreamy but inaccurate bass)
No point comparing it versus the SoundMAGIC PL-30 as it's years behind SQ wise. Not saying that the PL-30 is bad for the price however, far from that. I just feel it got the FOTM (flavour of the month) treatment here a bit too much and too hyped up. Will write up a quick KSC-75 comparison later.
I'll burn them in more later tonight and see whether the sound changes.
Are these a keeper? Probably.
Versus the Denon C700's? Damn hard to say which one I'd keep at the moment. Pros and Cons of both (Cons = Denon sound wise, iM716 external factors).