I’ve had the AKG 812 now for a few days. My impressions so far are very positive, though I’m certainly also hearing the problems in the treble. The 812 do many things well, like the frequency balance, the spacious sound and the heavy bass impact. The HD 800 have a cold and sterile quality to their sound which the AKG 812 completely lacks. The 812 aren’t as dark as the Audeze headphones either, so it’s right in the middle between the two, and to my ears it’s the closest to linear any high end headphone has gotten so far. The wearing comfort is also as good as the HD 800, so yesterday I wore the 812 for 8 hours straight and didn’t experience any comfort issues whatsoever. Quite a contrast to the Audeze LCD-2 and LCD-X which I can’t wear for more than 2.5 hours.
If only they didn’t have the high frequency distortion issue! It depends on the track whether you’ll hear it, but on worst case scenario tracks it’s quite grating to listen to. On most songs it’s like the issue doesn’t even exist, so it depends on the instruments, mics, vocalists etc whether the problem areas are being excited or not. With the majority of music there’s no problem. Maybe only 10% of my music have the issue audible in any way, and maybe 2% total are actively unpleasant to listen to. So personally this isn’t a killer. But I can certainly see how it would be if your favorite music happens to sound awful with them. Especially depending on how high your expectations are going in to these headphones.
The 812 are so close to perfect. I hope AKG start working on a MK II model and release that in two years, or however long it takes. As it is now I don’t think people should write them off completely, as they’re certainly way better than the Beyerdynamic T1 for example. It sure is annoying how nobody seems capable of making a perfect high end headphone with no issues or caveats whatsoever.