torifile
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- Posts
- 583
- Likes
- 500
The APM is a confusing product to talk about and read forum threads about because I think people are conflating things a little. Either they are in the wireless/ANC class of headphone like the XM4 and Bose *or* they are in the desktop class of mid-fi headphones like the LCD-2C, HD650, etc.
They are clearly better from a sound quality and build perspective than the wireless/ANC class. Heads and shoulders above, IMHO. And they are better with the smart features, too. Again, no comparison. They fall down on the case and on the price. I am in the fortunate position that a couple Benjamins will be quickly forgotten (and I'm sure many of you are too!). They are the only headphones that I'd consider as my daily drivers for music. I'll get a damned case and be done with it.
They get compared to the mid-fi class too. In this area, they are heads and shoulders ahead with convenience and cost. And, IMHO, sound quality. Hear me out - out of the box, no EQ, so many mid-fi and hi-fi cans, frankly, suck. They need amplification and equalization. At that point, you're talking about a very different experience. You're never just talking about the LCD-2C, you're talking about the the DAC and amp and source you're feeding them. Are you using them balanced? Via XLR or 4.4 mm jack? FLAC or MQA?
And when compared to mid-fi cans with all the accoutrements, they cost, what? 1/2? 1/3? That price difference does get my wallet nervous.
So, what ends up happening in a thread like this is that people talk about both. Often in the same post! The APM, in my opinion, don't really have a peer. That isn't to say they are "peerless" in the OMG THEY ARE SO AMAZING!!! sense, but in the "they are sort of in an in-between place" sense. For that reason alone, I think they deserve some praise. I'm keeping mine. I might also keep my LCD-2C and DAC/amp. I am definitely unloading my DAP, though. (I think the disruption from the APM may come to the DAP market, actually. We'll see.)
Anyway, my 2¢.
They are clearly better from a sound quality and build perspective than the wireless/ANC class. Heads and shoulders above, IMHO. And they are better with the smart features, too. Again, no comparison. They fall down on the case and on the price. I am in the fortunate position that a couple Benjamins will be quickly forgotten (and I'm sure many of you are too!). They are the only headphones that I'd consider as my daily drivers for music. I'll get a damned case and be done with it.
They get compared to the mid-fi class too. In this area, they are heads and shoulders ahead with convenience and cost. And, IMHO, sound quality. Hear me out - out of the box, no EQ, so many mid-fi and hi-fi cans, frankly, suck. They need amplification and equalization. At that point, you're talking about a very different experience. You're never just talking about the LCD-2C, you're talking about the the DAC and amp and source you're feeding them. Are you using them balanced? Via XLR or 4.4 mm jack? FLAC or MQA?
And when compared to mid-fi cans with all the accoutrements, they cost, what? 1/2? 1/3? That price difference does get my wallet nervous.
So, what ends up happening in a thread like this is that people talk about both. Often in the same post! The APM, in my opinion, don't really have a peer. That isn't to say they are "peerless" in the OMG THEY ARE SO AMAZING!!! sense, but in the "they are sort of in an in-between place" sense. For that reason alone, I think they deserve some praise. I'm keeping mine. I might also keep my LCD-2C and DAC/amp. I am definitely unloading my DAP, though. (I think the disruption from the APM may come to the DAP market, actually. We'll see.)
Anyway, my 2¢.
Last edited: